Skip to main content

Conspiracy and Consensus: Television Drama and the Case of A Very British Coup

  • Chapter
  • 85 Accesses

Part of the book series: Insights ((ISI))

Abstract

Ken Loach’s comment during shooting for his film Hidden Agenda 1 testifies to a vital strand in the popular consciousness, one which wove its way unmistakably into British film and television drama during the 1980s. Well before the allegations of a secret shoot to kill policy in Ulster (the subject of Loach’s film), before the revelations of Spycatcher, before Ponting, Tisdall and Massiter, British screen fictions had begun to reflect unease about the secret machinations of the state. Early forays at the turn of the decade into the Second World War legacy of black propaganda and secret intelligence in David Hare’s Licking Hitler and Ian McEwan’s The Imitation Game, and the underworld of municipal corruption, international crime and IRA terrorism in The Long Good Friday, paved the way for a cluster of films in the mid-1980s, all reflecting apprehension about the covert and increasingly authoritarian nature of centralised power in Britain. 1985 alone saw the release of the feature film Defence of the Realm, the BBC serial The Detective - which dealt with the unofficial growth of a national police force — and (also from the BBC) the television adaptation of Robert McCrum’s novel In the Secret State, a tale of the collusion between government, multi national corporations and private databases in the illicit surveillance of the ordinary citizen. In the same year, perhaps the most fêted television drama of the decade, the BBC serial Edge of Darkness, probed the dark triple alliance between Whitehall, a secretive nuclear industry and the new American entrepreneurial and technological ideology of the ‘high frontier’.

… it’s impossible to be paranoid nowadays because there are so many conspiracies about: and so paranoia has lost its meaning. If you don’t think there is a conspiracy you’re really terribly naive. And after what we’ve learnt about the intelligence services just recently, plainly there are conspiracies going on all over the place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See D. Perretta, ‘Coup de Grace’, Time Out, 15–22 June 1988, p. 47. The other travellers were Peter Hain, Stuart Holland and Tony Banks.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Petley, ‘A Very Pretty British Coup’, Sight and Sound, 57, 2 (Spring 1988), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Itzin, Stages in the Revolution: political theatre in Britain since 1968 (London: Eyre Methuen, 1980) p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See N. Andrews, ‘Trevor and Bill: on putting politics before News at Ten’, The Leveller, November 1976, pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Hare et at., Ah! Mischief: The Writer in Television (London: Faber and Faber, 1982) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Stephen Gilbert, ‘The TV Play: Outside the Consensus’, Screen Education, Summer 1985, 35, pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See G. Murdock, ‘Radical drama, radical theatre’, Media, Culture and Society, 1980, 2, p. 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Griffiths, Preface to Through the Night and Such Impossibilities (London: Faber and Faber, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Eagleton, ‘Towards a Critique of Political Fiction’, Meanjin, 3, 1980, p. 383.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Denning, Cover Stories: Narrative and Ideology in the British Spy Thriller (London: RKP, 1987) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Edgar, ‘On political theatre: part two’, Socialist Review, May 1978, pp. 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Bradbury, Introduction to The After Dinner Game (London: Hutchinson, 1982) pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Editorial Board, Lumière (co-operative) Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ridgman, J. (1992). Conspiracy and Consensus: Television Drama and the Case of A Very British Coup . In: Holderness, G. (eds) The Politics of Theatre and Drama. Insights. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21792-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics