Abstract
The Cambridge debate over capital theory has raised doubts about the validity of the neo-Classical theory of distribution (see G.C. Harcourt). As this theory is widely assumed in empirical work, and often drawn upon in the analysis of policy, a demonstration that it is seriously flawed would require extensive rethinking of many areas of mainstream economics. Accordingly, two principal lines of defense have been advanced. The first, an oblique defense, accepts the critique, but asserts that only a simplifying ‘parable’ has been damaged. The main corpus of neo-Classicism, general equilibrium theory, remains unscatched. The second is a counterattack, and contends that a well-ordered neo-Classical production function can be constructed after all (see Gallaway and Shukla, 1974, and refutations by Garegnani and by Sato, 1976).
* American Economic Review, 67(5) (1977).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albin, P. (1975) ‘Reswitching: An Empirical Observation,’ Kyklos, 1 (28) pp. 149–54.
Bhaduri, A. (1969) ‘On the Significance of Recent Controversies on Capital Theory: A Marxian View,’ Economic Journal, 79, pp. 532–9.
Bharadwaj, K. (1970) ‘On the Maximum Number of Switches Between Two Production Systems,’ Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 106, pp. 409–29.
Bruno, M. et al. (1966) ‘Nature and Implications of the Reswitching of Techniques’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, pp. 526–53.
Champernowne, D.G. (1954) ‘The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment,’ Review of Economic Studies, 2 (21) pp. 112–35.
Clark, John B. (1956) The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits (New York: Macmillan).
Gallaway, L. and V. Shukla (1974) ‘The Neoclassical Production Function,’ American Economic Review, 64, pp. 348–58.
Gallaway, L. and V. Shukla (1976) ‘Reply,’ American Economic Review, 66, pp. 433–6.
Garegnani, P. (1966) ‘Switching of Techniques,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, pp. 554–67.
Garegnani, P. (1970) ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution,’ Review of Economic Studies, 37, pp. 407–36.
Garegnani, P. (1976) ‘The Neoclassical Production Function: Comment,’ American Economic Review, 66, pp. 424–7.
Harcourt, G.C. (1972) Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital (London, New York).
Hicks, John (1963) Theory of Wages (London) 2nd edn.
Hicks, John (1965) Capital and Growth (New York).
Hollis, Martin and Nell, Edward J. (1975) Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo-Classical Economics (London, New York).
Nell, E.J. (1970) ‘A Note on Cambridge Controversies in Capital Theory,’ Journal of Economic Literature, 8, pp. 41–4.
Robinson, J. (1954) ‘The Production Function and the Theory of Capital,’ Review of Economic Studies, 2 (21) pp. 81–106.
Robinson, J. (1970) ‘Capital Theory Up to Date,’ Canadian Journal of Economics, 3, pp. 309–17.
Samuelson, P.A. (1962) ‘Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function,’ Review of Economic Studies, 29, pp. 193–206.
Sato, K. (1976) ‘The Neoclassical Production Function: Comment,’ American Economic Review, 66, pp. 428–33.
Spaventa, L. (1970) ‘The Rate of Profit, Rate of Growth and Capital Intensity in a Simple Production Model,’ Oxford Economic Papers, 22, pp. 129–47.
Sraffa, Piero (1960) Production of Commodities By Means of Commodities (London, New York).
Copyright information
© 1992 Edward J. Nell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laibman, D., Nell, E. (1992). Reswitching, Wicksell Effects, and the Neo-Classical Production Function. In: Transformational Growth and Effective Demand. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21779-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21779-3_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21781-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21779-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)