Abstract
Population pressure has recently emerged as a fashionable explanation both for the shift from semi-nomadic slash and burn agriculture to settled cultivation and for the intensification of already settled cultivation. Thus Boserup (1965) and her followers account for an entire sequence of agricultural transformations through population changes. Others explain the fifteenth-century decline of rents and agricultural prices coupled with the prosperity of laborers and artisans by the decline in population following the Black Death. Or again, a seemingly new orthodoxy, which replaces the Hamilton-Keynes thesis, holds that the Elizabethan inflation resulted not so much from an influx of New World treasure, as from the rapid growth of population in the sixteenth century.
* Reprinted from S. Diamond (ed.), Towards a Marxist Anthropology (The Hague: Mouton, 1974).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boserup, E. (1965) The Conditions of Agricultural Growth (Chicago: Aldine).
Brown, J.A.C. (1960) Social Psychology of Industry (New York: Penguin).
Robinson, Joan (1952) ‘Beauty and the beast,’ in Collected Economic Papers, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Edward J. Nell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nell, E.J. (1992). Population Pressure and Methods of Cultivation: a Critique of Classless Theory. In: Transformational Growth and Effective Demand. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21779-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21779-3_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21781-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21779-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)