Abstract
This chapter is the most difficult and important of the theoretical chapters, not only because it attempts to summarize the relation between the three levels, but also because it focuses on the relation between stage theory and historical analysis, which is the least clear and most difficult to specify of the interrelationships between the three levels of analysis. The relation between all kinds of mid-range theory and historical analysis has generally been neglected in the social sciences, and even Unoists have generally not maintained a clear and sharp distinction between stage theory and historical analysis. The cost of neglecting this distinction is the very autonomy of historical analysis. Lack of clarity on the relation between stage theory and historical analysis can result in a most insidious reductionist functionalism, in which “middle range theory” intermingles with various historical agencies only to impose from above a preformed logic. Even though at times there seems to be an apparent overlap between stage theory and historical analysis, and even though it may be difficult to get the distinction clear and sharp, I believe that it is crucial to attempt to so so.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 Robert Albritton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albritton, R. (1991). Historical Analysis as a Level of Political Economy. In: A Japanese Approach to Stages of Capitalist Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21776-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21776-2_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21778-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21776-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)