Abstract
The problems of labour are at the heart of Marx’s opus, from his youth to his maturity. That is why it may seem tempting to make of this theme the unifying principle in a diverse and voluminous body of thought. Of course, there are many differences between the analyses of alienated labour in the 1844 Manuscripts and those of exploitation of labour in Capital, but one might ask whether these do not boil down to a single set of questions about the centrality of labour in contemporary society — or labour’s significance or lack of it. From this perspective, Marx appears much more dependent than he himself imagined on the classical political economy of his time, which reflected the ever more crucial role of production within the broad range of social activity of the bourgeois era. Marx, in this framework, is perceived as having remained a prisoner, throughout all his works, of Hegelian conceptions in which labour is interpreted as the externalisation of the subject, of consciousness, in a context in which the latter constantly threatens to become alienation and loss of control over action. Marx’s theorisation is thus seen as marked by ‘economism’, that is, a primacy of the relations of production over other social relations and by a simplified model of action which favours the transforming action of the material world, to the detriment of communications and the various forms of human interaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
This type of position is defended in Ernst Michael Lange’s Das Prinzip Arbeit, Drei Metakritische Kapitel über Grundbegriffen, Struktur und Darstellung der Kritik der politischen ökonomie von Karl Marx, Frankfurt am Main, 1980;
Jean-Luc Petit, Du travail vivant au système des actions. Une discussion de Marx, Paris, 1980.
In a different approach which reconstructs more faithfully the complexity of Marx’s positions, see J. A. Gianotti, Origines de la dialectique du travail, Paris, 1971.
Kostas Axelos, Marx, penseur de la technique, Paris, 1961.
This is the argument developed by Antonio Negri in Marx au-dell de Marx, Paris, 1979. Negri sees the Grundrisse as the keystone of Marx’s entire opus.
The literature on this subject is immense. Here we shall mention only
Ian Steedman, Marx after Sraffa, London, 1977;
Gilles Dostaler, Marx, la valeur et l’économie politique, Paris, 1978;
Pierangelo Geragnani, Marx e gli economists clasici, Oxford, 1982.
See, for example
Christian Barrère, Lire la crise, Paris, 1983.
See Michael Aglietta, Régulation et crises du capitalisme. L’expérience des Etats-Unis, Paris, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vincent, JM. (1991). The Fetish of Labour and its Dominion: The Critique of Economy as Critique of the Value-Form. In: Abstract Labour: A Critique. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21744-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21744-1_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-51381-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21744-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)