Skip to main content

Some Psychological Bases of the Institution of War

  • Chapter
The Institution of War
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Attention is focused upon an important perspective if war is to be thought of as an institution. The Oxford English Dictionary describes the use of the word ‘institution’ in a number of ways which include

an established law, custom, usage, practice, organization or other element in the political or social life of a people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • S.E. Asch (1951) ‘Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements’, in Groups, Leadership and Men, edited by H. Guetzkow (Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bateson (1989) ‘Is aggression instinctive?’, in Aggression and War: Their Biological and Social Bases, edited by J. Groebel and R.A. Hinde (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Bronfenbrenner (1961) ‘The mirror image in Soviet-American relations: A social psychologist’s report’, Journal of Social Issues, 17, 46–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Chemers (1983) ‘Leadership theory and research: A systems-process integration’, in Basic group processes, edited by P.B. Paulus (New York: Springer-Verlag) 9–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Chemers and G.J. Skrzpek (1972) ‘An experimental test of the Contingency Model of leadership effectiveness’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 172–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.E. Fiedler (1964) ‘A contingency model of leadership effectiveness’, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1, edited by L. Berko-witz (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.G. Geen and N.B. Quantry (1977) ‘The catharsis of aggression: an evaluation of an hypothesis’, Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology, 10, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. House (1971) ‘A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Kenny and S.J. Zaccaro (1983) ‘An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 678–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Lott and B.E. Lott (1961) ‘Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 408–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.C. McClelland and R.E. Boyatzis (1982) ‘Leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 737–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Panskeep (1980) ‘Opiates and Social Dependence’, in Endogenous and Exogenous Opiate Agonists and Antagonists, edited by E.L. Way (New York: Pergamon Press) 561–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.K. Roper (1975) ‘Evidence of warfare in the Near East from 10 000 to 4300 B.C.’, in War, its Causes and Correlates, edited by M.A. Nettleship (The Hague: Mouton) 299–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sherif (1958)’supraordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict’, American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Strube and J.E. Garcia (1981) ‘A meta-analytic investigation of Fiedler’s contingency model of leadership-effectiveness’, Psychological Bulletin, 90, 307–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V.H. Vroom and P.W. Yetton (1973) Leadership and Decision Making (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Robert A. Hinde

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Middleton, H. (1992). Some Psychological Bases of the Institution of War. In: Hinde, R.A. (eds) The Institution of War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21707-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics