Skip to main content

A Note on Patriotism and Nationalism

  • Chapter
The Institution of War
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

For a threat to go to war to be plausible to outsiders, and even more for a state of war to be maintained, the individuals involved must be adequately motivated. As we have seen (Chapter 1), in most modern wars hope of individual gain is of minor significance, though protection of loved ones may be important. The aggressive propensities of individuals are likewise of primarily indirect significance, unless hand-to-hand fighting is involved. The correlations between individual aggressiveness and attitudes towards aggressive military policies tend to be positive but low (Feshbach 1990). The primary motivating factors in war seem to be the ideals, secular or religious, which are themselves the product of group values bolstered by propaganda. With certain reservations to be mentioned later, we can refer to these ideals as ‘patriotic’. Patriotism can involve a willingness to incur extreme costs, involving even life itself, for the sake of the in-group. Clearly, powerful forces are at work: what exactly is their nature?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bateson, P.P.G. (1980) ‘Optimal outbreeding and the development of sexual preference in the Japanese Quail’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 53, 231–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P.P.G. (1989) ‘Evolution and Ethics’, in M. Keynes and G. Ains-worth Harrison (eds), Evolutionary Studies (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J. (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., Nelson, D. and Reeves, K. (1966) ‘Effects of consensual validation and invalidation on attraction as a function of verifiability’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, S. (1987) ‘Individual aggression, national attachment and the search for peace’, Aggressive Behaviour 13, 315–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, S. (1990) ‘Psychology, human violence, and the search for peace: issues in science and social values’, Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. ‘The genetical theory of social behaviour’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A. (1979) Towards Understanding Relationships (London: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A. (1987a) ‘Patriotism: is kin selection both necessary and sufficient?’ Politics and the Life Sciences, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A. (1987b) Individuals, Relationships and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.R. (1986) ‘Kin selection, socialization and patriotism: an integrating theory’, Politics and the Life Sciences, 4, 127–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.R. (1989) ‘The role of kin recognition mechanisms in patriotic socialization: further reflections’, Politics and the Life Sciences, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A. (1970) ‘A brief introduction to Personal Construct Theory’, in D. Bannister (ed.), Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory (London: i Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosterman, R. and Feshbach, S. (1989) ‘Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes’, Political Psychology, 10 251–1 A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.B. and Davies, N.B. (1978) An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (Sunderland, Mass.: Sinnauer Assoc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, P.L. (1978) ‘Bridging the paradigms: biology and the social sciences’, in M.S. Gregory, A. Silvers and D. Sutch (eds), Sociology and Human Nature (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlström, R. (1987) ‘The image of the enemy as a psychological antecedent of warfare’, in J.M. Ramirez, R. A. Hinde and J. Groebel (eds), Essays on Violence (Seville: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. (1974) ‘social comparison and selective affiliation’, in T.L. Huston (ed.), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1968) ‘Attitudinal effects of mere exposure’, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Robert A. Hinde

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hinde, R.A. (1992). A Note on Patriotism and Nationalism. In: Hinde, R.A. (eds) The Institution of War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21707-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics