Skip to main content

Abstract

The object of this book has been to demonstrate the conservative, unsatisfactory nature and consequences of current social theory and to show how the social sciences could be truly informative and transformative. The lack of a progressive dynamic in current social theory involves the assumption that social scientific data are distinct from the data of other forms of explanation. In each manifestation, we find a contradictory division in the categories and criteria of explanation which produces in the social sciences a variety of dualisms. These dualisms are usually recognised as contradictory in the writings of others, yet, at the same time, they are accepted as descriptive of the problems that the social sciences peculiarly must address. Neither aspect of a dualism can be abandoned for the other because the contradictory form sets each as an entailment to the other. Sooner or later, efforts at synthesis are shown to be equally ill-founded and, ultimately, the contradiction, initially argued to be unnecessary, is embraced as definitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 John Holmwood and Alexander Stewart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmwood, J., Stewart, A. (1991). Conclusion. In: Explanation and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21627-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics