Skip to main content

Political Structures and Broadcasting Marketisation: a Comparison of Britain and West Germany

  • Chapter
The Market and the State

Abstract

Until recently broadcasting policy in Britain and West Germany has been characterised by a longstanding commitment to public-service monopoly or duopoly service provision: commercial competition has not been a feature of either system (although private broadcasters have been allowed in Britain since 1955). However, in both countries neo-liberal party or coalition governments have come to power with very similar ideological convictions, aiming to break up these structures and replace them with more commercial and competitive ones. This ‘marketisation’ of the broadcasting sector has been propelled by commonly experienced technological and market pressures, and actively engineered by almost identical coalitions of domestic political actors pushing for regulatory change. Despite all these pressures for sectoral, cross-national policy convergence, a significant variation has occurred in policy-making ‘style’ between these two countries, pointing towards an important element of divergence of policy outcomes (the policy process is not quite complete in the British case at the time of writing).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. K. Dyson and P. Humphreys, Broadcasting and New Media Policies in Western Europe (London: Routledge, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Dyson and P. Humphreys, ‘Deregulating Broadcasting: the West European Experience’, European Journal of Political Research, 17 (1989) 137–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, W. Hoffmann-Riem, ‘New Media in West Germany: the Politics of Legitimation’, in K. Dyson and P. Humphreys, The Political Economy of Communications (London: Routledge 1990) pp. 171–97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Lijphart, Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries (New Haven, Conn, and London: Yale University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Jordan and J. Richardson, ‘The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiation’, in J. Richardson (ed.), Policy Styles in Western Europe (London: Allen and Unwin, 1982), pp. 80–110.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hayward, ‘National Aptitudes for Planning in Britain, France and Italy’, Government and Opposition, 9, 4 (1974) 397–410, 398–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Tunstall, ‘Media Policy Dilemmas and Indecisions’, Parliamentary Affairs, 37, 3 (1984) 310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Dyson and P. Humphreys, ‘The New Media in Britain and France’, Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 33:3–4 (1985) 366.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Katzenstein, Policy and Politics in West Germany. The Growth of a Semi-Sovereign State (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Humphreys, Media and Media Policy in West Germany (Oxford: Berg, 1990) ch. 4, pp. 155–92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Smith, Democracy in West Germany (London: Heinemann, 1979), p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., pp. 270–80. For the Court’s ruling see: ‘Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 4. November 1986 — IBvF 1/1984’, Media Perspektiven Dokumentation, IV/1986, pp. 213–47. An evaluation of this law, in English, is contained in K. Berg, ‘The Fourth TV Judgement of the Federal Constitutional Court’, EBU Review, 38, 3 (May 1987) 37–43. For the inter-state treaty see: ‘Staatsvertrag zur Neuordnung des Rundfunkwesens vom 12. März 1987’, Media Perspektiven. Dokumentation, 2 (1987) 81–8. For a very useful discussion of this treaty, in English

    Google Scholar 

  13. see: K. Berg, ‘The Inter-State Treaty on the Reform of the Broadcasting System in the FRG’, EBV Review, 39, 2 (March 1988) 40–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Wilks and M. Wright, ‘Policy Community, Policy Network and Comparative Industrial Policies’, the ‘Conclusion’ in S. Wilks and M. Wright (eds), Comparative Government-Industry Relations; Western Europe, the United States and Japan (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 274–313

    Google Scholar 

  15. and M. Wright, ‘Policy Community, Policy Network and Comparative Industrial Policies’, Political Studies, 36 (1988) 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Hall, Governing the Economy: the Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986), pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Schmidt, ‘Learning from Catastrophes: West Germany’s Public Policy’, in F. Castles, The Comparative History of Public Policy, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989) pp. 56–99, p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Michael Moran and Maurice Wright

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Humphreys, P. (1991). Political Structures and Broadcasting Marketisation: a Comparison of Britain and West Germany. In: Moran, M., Wright, M. (eds) The Market and the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21619-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics