The bus industry and the cases of Australia, The USA and the UK

  • J. S. Dodgson

Abstract

This chapter considers deregulation, privatisation and tendering for service in the bus industries of three countries, Great Britain, Australia and the United States. For long-distance bus services there has been common experience of deregulation and liberalisation of entry conditions, and broadly common results of expansion of service and benefits to consumers. For local services, on which this chapter concentrates, the three countries have faced similar problems (common to the rest of the developed world) of rising deficits and poor productivity performance. However the response has been different. In Great Britain outside London services have been deregulated and the free market has been allowed to determine the level of commercial services and fares, with competitive tendering then used to provide subsidised services. In London, and in a number of cities in the United States and Australia, there have been moves within a regulated framework toward tendering of services, usually though not always on a competitive basis. This chapter reviews and compares the different experience. It should be noted that for Australia and the United States local bus service is synonymous with urban bus service, whereas in Great Britain there are many local (i.e. short-distance) rural bus services which do not have a counterpart in the wider open spaces of America and Australia.

Keywords

Europe Transportation Income Nash Conglomerate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Note The initials TC refer to a paper presented at the Thredbo Conference (see Acknowledgement).Google Scholar
  2. Amos, P., and Staffs, M. (1989) ‘Buses in a dry climate’, TC.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, S.C. (1983) ‘The effect of government ownership and subsidy on performance: evidence from the bus transit industry’ Transportation Research A, vol. 17, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, A. J. (1986) ‘Regulatory reform and rural bus service: evidence from South Dakota’ Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 20, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beesley, M., and Glaister, S. (1989) ‘Bidding for tendered bus routes in London’, TC.Google Scholar
  6. Button, K. J. (1987) ‘The effects of regulatory reform on the US inter-city bus industry’ Transport Reviews, vol. 7, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Button, K. J. (1988) ‘Contestability in the UK bus industry, experience of goods and economies of experience’, in Dodgson, J. S., and Topham, N. Bus Deregulation and Privatisation an International Perspective, (Aldershot: Avebury).Google Scholar
  8. Department of Transport, Scottish Office, Welsh Office (1984) Buses, (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  9. Dodgson, J. S., and Katsoulacos, Y. (1989a) ‘Competition, contestability and predation: the economics of competition in deregulated bus markets’, TC.Google Scholar
  10. Dodgson, J. S., and Katsoulacos, Y. (1989b) ‘Deregulation and predatory behaviour: the case of local bus services’, paper presented to the Fifth World Conference on Transport Research, Yokohama, July.Google Scholar
  11. Downs, C. (1988) ‘Private and public local bus services compared: the case of New York City’ Transportation Quarterly, vol. 42, 553–570.Google Scholar
  12. Eckert, R. D., and Hilton, G. W. (1972) ‘The jitneys’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 15, 293–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, A. (1988) ‘Hereford: a case study of bus deregulation’ Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol. 22, 283–306.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, A. (1989) ‘Some case studies of local bus competition in Britain’, TC.Google Scholar
  15. Federal Bureau of Transport Economics (1987) Intrastate Bus Services in New South Wales; Trial Area Liberalisation (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service).Google Scholar
  16. Hensher, D. A. (1987) ‘Productive efficiency and ownership of urban bus services’ Transportation, vol. 14, 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hensher, D. A. (1988) ‘Productivity in privately owned and operated bus firms in Australia’ in Dodgson, J. S., and Topham, N. Bus deregulation and privatisation: an international perspective, (Aldershot: Avebury).Google Scholar
  18. Higginson, M. (1989) ‘Deregulate: who dares? The London experience’, TC.Google Scholar
  19. Jaffer, S. M., and Thompson, D. J. (1986) ‘Deregulated express coaches: a reassessment’, Fiscal Studies, vol. 7, 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, G. K., and Kirby, R. F. (1989) ‘How can private sector financial incentives work at transit agencies?’ Transportation Quarterly, vol. 43, 239–258.Google Scholar
  21. Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1989) Badgerline Holdings Ltd and Midland Red West Holdings Ltd, (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  22. Nash, C. A. (1988) ‘Integration of public transport: an economic assessment’, in Dodgson, J. S., and Topham, N. Bus Deregulation and Privatisation: an International Perspective, (Aldershot: Avebury).Google Scholar
  23. Pickrell, D. H. (1985) ‘Rising deficits and the uses of transit subsidies in the United States’ Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol. 19, 281–298.Google Scholar
  24. Preston, J. (1988) ‘Regulation, competition and market structure: a literature review of the stage bus industry’, (University of Leeds: Institute for Transport Studies), Working Paper 267, 12–13.Google Scholar
  25. Pucher, J. (1988) ‘Urban public transport subsidies in Western Europe and North America’ Transportation Quarterly, vol. 42, 377–402.Google Scholar
  26. Pucher, J., Markstedt, A., and Hirschman, I. (1983) ‘Impacts of subsidies on the costs of urban public transport’ Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol. 18, 155–176.Google Scholar
  27. Stigler, G. J. (1971) ‘The theory of economic regulation’ Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 19, 211–248.Google Scholar
  28. Talley, W. K. (1989) ‘Competition in the provision of US and UK bus services: privatisation vs. deregulation’ in Dodgson, J. S., and Topham, N. Bus Deregulation and Privatisation: an International Perspective, (Aldershot: Avebury).Google Scholar
  29. Teal, R. F. (1988) ‘Public transit service contracting: a status report’ Transportation Quarterly, vol. 42, 207–222.Google Scholar
  30. Teal, R. F. (1989) ‘Issues raised by competitive contracting of bus transit services in the USA’, TC.Google Scholar
  31. Teal, R. F., and Nemer, T. (1986) ‘Privatisation of urban transit: the Los Angeles jitney experience’, Transportation, vol. 13, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tyson, W. J. (1988) A Review of the First Year of Bus Deregulation, (London: Association of Metropolitan Authorities).Google Scholar
  33. Wallis, I. P. (1980) ‘Private bus operations in urban areas — their economics and role’ Traffic Engineering and Control, vol. 21, 605–610.Google Scholar
  34. White, P. R. and Turner, R. (1989) ‘Overall impacts of local bus deregulation in Britain’ (revised June), TC.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, N. H. M. (1989) ‘Organisational options for public transportation in the US’, TC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kenneth Button and David Pitfield 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. S. Dodgson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations