Skip to main content
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

Liberal democracy emerged as a largely accidental combination of a new economic theory with a particular set of political arrangements; accidental in the sense of being neither foregone, nor originally intended. As the doctrines of economic liberalism were refined in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, there was nothing inevitable about the associated victory of parliamentary democracy. ‘Indeed it is unlikely that more than a very few people had any but the haziest notions as to what the words could mean or what kind of society might lie over the horizon’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Barrington Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, 1967, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. A. Mackinnon, On the Rise, Progress, and Present State of Public Opinion in Great Britain and Other Parts of the World, 1828, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrew Levine, Liberal Democracy: A Critique of its Theory, 1981, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anthony Arblaster, The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism, 1984, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tom Paine, Common Sense, 1776, in John Dos Passos, The Living Thoughts of Tom Paine, 1946, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barrington Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, 1967, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See C.B. Macpherson, The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, 1977, 44–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, 1960, and also his Road to Serfdom, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dan Usher, The Economic Prerequisite to Democracy, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See E. S. Greenberg, ‘Liberal Culture and Capitalist Hegemony’, in M. J. G. McGrath, (ed.), Liberalism and the Modern Polity, 1978, 269.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anthony Arblaster, The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism, 1984, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robert Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory, 1956, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, for example, H.F. Pitkin, The Concept of Representation, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, for example, R.A. Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory, 1956, 6771, for a detailed description of the operational conditions held to be necessary for a democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Peter Bachrach, ‘Interest, Participation, and Democratic Theory’, in J. R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds.), Participation in Politics, 1975, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. John Plamenatz, ‘Electoral Studies and Democratic Theory’, Political Studies, 6, 1958, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. W. Keim, ‘Participation in Contemporary Democratic Theories’, in J. R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds.), Participation in Politics, 1975, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peter Bachrach, The Theory of Democratic Elitism, 1967, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See, for example, G.A. Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. H. Riker, Liberalism Against Populism, 1982, xii.

    Google Scholar 

  21. John Plamenatz, Democracy and Illusion, 1973, 181.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrew Levine, Liberal Democracy: A Critique of its Theory, 1981, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. H. Carr, The New Society, 1951, 109. Note also, in a similar vein

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.H. Tawney, Equality, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jonathan Riley, ‘On the Possibility of Liberal Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 79 (4), 1985, 1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Manifestoof the Communist Party. Paging from H. J. Laski, Communist Manifesto: Socialist Landmark, 1967, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Graham Wallas, Human Nature in Politics, 1908, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Anthony Arblaster, The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism, 1984, 326.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Barry Holden, ‘Liberal Democracy and the Social Determination of Ideas’, in J. R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds.), Liberal Democracy, 1983, 289–312.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Murray Edelman, Politics as Symbolic Action, 1971, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Walter Lippmann, Public Opinion, 1922, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richard Rose, Influencing Voters: A Study in Campaign Rationality, 1967, 15. Note also

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cornelius O’Leary, The Elimination of Corrupt Practices in British Elections, 1868–1911, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. J. Boorstin, ‘The Rhetoric of Democracy’, in Robert Atwan et al., American Mass Media, 1978, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See Gabriel Marcel, Man Against Mass Society, 1985, 52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Terence H. Qualter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qualter, T.H. (1991). The Liberal Democratic Ideal. In: Advertising and Democracy in the Mass Age. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21610-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics