Skip to main content

Ferdinand II: Founder of the Habsburg Monarchy

  • Chapter
Crown, Church and Estates

Abstract

On 10 May 1621, shortly after the defeat of the Bohemian Revolt, Emperor Ferdinand II signed his last will and testament. Fourteen years later, on 8 August 1635, after the Peace of Prague, which had compelled him to retreat from his efforts at Counter-Reformation in the Empire, he reaffirmed the same testament in solemn fashion.1 The theme of this document was the unity he hoped to impose on the lands of his inheritance, the Austrian territories along with Bohemia and Hungary, by binding them together under one ruler through the introduction of strict primogeniture and especially by uniting them in the Catholic religion. As far as the estates of his various territories were concerned, Ferdinand, who was the first Habsburg ruler to establish clear dominance over them, asserted that he wanted their legitimate rights and privileges to be respected, thus indicating his intention to continue to involve them in government. This testament, issued in such crucial times, serves as a key to Ferdinand’s goals; and these goals and especially the degree to which he implemented them make him, more than any other individual, the founder of the Habsburg Monarchy in Central Europe. Not that his role has been overlooked in the past: that is clear from the writings of Hans Sturmberger.2

I am grateful to the National Endowment for the Humanities and to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey for the support they provided while I did the initial work on this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Winfried Schulze, ‘Hausgesetzgebung und Verstaatlichung im Hause Österreich vom Tode Maximilians I bis zur Pragmatischen Sanktion’, in Der dynastische Fürstenstaat. Zur Bedeutung von Sukzes- sionsordnungen für die Entstehung des frühmodernen Staates, ed. Johannes Kunisch (Berlin, 1982) 264–6, 270–1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Bireley, Religion and Politics in the Age of the Counter-Reformation: Emperor Ferdinand II, William Lamormaini, S.J., and the Formation of Imperial Policy (Chapel Hill, 1981) 16, 235.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hugo Hantsch, Die Geschichte Österreichs, vol. i (4th edn, Graz) 343–4; Eila Hassenpflug-Elzholz, Bőhmen und die bőhmischen Stände in der Zeit des beginnenden Zentralismus (Munich, 1982) 72, 75–7; Friedrich Walter, Òsterreichische Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsgeschichte von 1500 bis 1955 (Vienna, 1972) 70–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winfried Schulze, Reich und Türkengefahr im späten 16. Jahrhundert. Studien zu den politischen und gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen einer auß eren Bedrohung (Munich, 1978) 153–5, 365–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johann Rainer, ‘Kardinal Melchior Klesl (1552–1630). Vom “General- reformator” zum Ausgleichspolitiker’, Rőmische Quartalschrift, xlix (1964) 22–7; idem., ‘Der Prozess gegen Kardinal Klesl’, Rőmische Historische Mitteilungen, v (1962) 59–60; R.R. Heinisch, ‘Habsburg, die Pforte und der bőhmische Aufstand, 1618–1620; Südostforschungen, xxxiii (1974) 129, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johann Rainer, ‘Kardinal Melchior Klesl’, 25–33; Hugo Altmann, Die Reichspolitik Maximilians I von Bayern, 1613–1618 (Munich, 1978) 130–1, 147–9, 161, 190–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Hassenpflug-Elzholz, ‘Die bőhmische Adelsnation als Representantin des Kőnigreichs Bőhmen von der Inkraftsetzung der Vemeuerten Landesordnung bis zum Regierungsantritt Maria Theresias’, Bohemia Jahrbuch, xv (1974) 75–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Rebel, Peasant Classes: The Bureaucratization of Property and Family Relations under Early Habsburg Absolutism, 1511–1636 (Princeton, 1983) 138–9, 234, 283.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert D. Chesler, ‘Crown, Lords, and God: The Establishment of Secular Authority in the Pacification of Lower Austria’ (Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 1979) 199–200, 218, 281–2, 291, 344.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Bireley, ‘Antimachiavellianism, the Baroque, and Maximilian of Bavaria’, Archivum Historicum Societatis Jesu, liii (1984) 139–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodolfo de Mattei, II problema della ‘ragion di stato’ nell’eta della Controriforma (Milan/Naples, 1979) 65.

    Google Scholar 

  12. André Stegmann, L’Héroisme cornélien, Genése et signification (Paris, 1968) ii, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerhard Oestreich, Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (Cambridge, 1982) 57–8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 School of Slavonic and East European Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bireley, R. (1991). Ferdinand II: Founder of the Habsburg Monarchy. In: Evans, R.J.W., Thomas, T.V. (eds) Crown, Church and Estates. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21579-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics