Advertisement

Estates and the Problem of Resistance in Theory and Practice in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries

  • Winfried Schulze

Abstract

From the modern perspective, Central and East-Central Europe at the end of the sixteenth and the beginning of the seventeenth century seem to present a reasonably clear and unequivocal political picture. I need describe it only briefly here since its essential features were determined by the victory of the princes. As the confessional territorial state developed, the princes’ sphere of responsibility expanded. The princely state gained control over areas previously ruled autonomously by the nobility: it guaranteed the uniformity of religion; organised and regulated new forms of judicial proceedings; collected increasing tax revenues; appointed university professors and the like; conducted ecclesiastical visitations; and guaranteed the existing social order. All this fits into a long-term pattern leading from the beginnings of the consolidation of dynasties and secular rule in the late Middle Ages to the trend towards bureaucratisation characteristic of the late eighteenth century. The years around 1600, which particularly interest us here, are of special significance in this context. After the various crises of the sixteenth century, the outlines of the early modern state emerged and were consolidated at that time, a process which became apparent first in the financial side of the state’s activities, then in its military, economic and administrative functions.

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Sixteenth Century Early Modern Period Religious Struggle Peasant Revolt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Baron, Hans, ‘Calvinist Republicanism and its Historical Roots’, Church History, viii (1939) 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Idem, ‘Religion and Politics in the German Imperial Cities during the Reformation’, English Historical Review, lii (1937) 405–27, 614–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benert, R.R., ‘Inferior Magistrates in Sixteenth Century Political and Legal Thought’ (Diss. University of Minnesota, 1967).Google Scholar
  4. Idem, ‘Lutheran Resistance Theory and the Imperial Constitution’, in Il pensiero politico (1973) 17–36.Google Scholar
  5. Jürgen Dennert ed., Beza, Brutus, Hotman. Calvinistische Mon- archomachen (Cologne/Opladen, 1968).Google Scholar
  6. Elliott, J.H., ‘Revolution and Continuity in Early Modern Europe’, Past and Present, xlii (1969) 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franklin, J.H., Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
  8. Gierke, Otto von, Johannes Althusius und die Entwicklung der naturrechtlichen Staatstheorien (5th edn., Aalen, 1958).Google Scholar
  9. Gilmore, Myron P., Argument from Roman Law in Political Thought, 1200–1600 (Cambridge, 1941).Google Scholar
  10. Hildebrandt, E., ‘The Magdeburg Bekenntnis on a Possible Link between German and English Resistance Theory in the Sixteenth Century’, Archiv für Reformations geschichte, lxxi (1980) 227–53.Google Scholar
  11. Hoyer, S., ‘Bemerkungen zu Luthers Auffassung über das Wider- standsrecht der Stände gegen den Kaiser (1539)’, in Martin Luther— Leben, Werk, Wirkung, ed. Günter Vogler (1983) 255–68.Google Scholar
  12. Huschke, Rolf Bernhard, Melanchthons Lehre vom Ordo politicus. Ein Beitrag zum Verhältnis von Glauben und politischem Handeln bei Melanchthon (Gütersloh, 1968).Google Scholar
  13. Widerstandsrecht, ed. Arthur Kaufmann and L.E. Backmann (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar
  14. Kreutzer, Jakob, Zwinglis Lehre von der Obrigkeit (Stuttgart, 1909; reprinted Amsterdam, 1965).Google Scholar
  15. Lüthje, H., ‘Melanchthons Anschauung über das Recht des Widerstands gegen die Staatsgewalt’, Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte, NF x (1928) 512–42.Google Scholar
  16. McNeill, J., ‘The Democratic Element in Calvin’s Thought’, Church History, xviii (1949) 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oestreich, Gerhard, ‘Die Idee des religiösen Bundes und die Lehre vom Staatsvertrag’, in his Geist und Gestalt des frühmodernen Staates (Berlin, 1969) 157–78.Google Scholar
  18. Scheible, Heinz, Das Widerstandsrecht als Problem der deutschen Protes- tanten, 1523–1546 (Gütersloh, 1969).Google Scholar
  19. Schulze, Winfried, Landesdefension und Staatsbildung. Studien zum Kriegswesen des innerösterreichischen Territorialstaates (1564–1619) (Vienna/Cologne, 1973).Google Scholar
  20. Idem, Bäuerlicher Widerstand und feudale Herrschaft in der frühen Neuzeit (Stuttgart, 1980).Google Scholar
  21. Skinner, Quentin, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. II: The Age of Reformation (Cambridge, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strieker, G., ‘Das politische Denken der Monarchomachen’ (Diss., Heidelberg, 1967).Google Scholar
  23. Strohl, H., ‘Le Droit à la résistance d’après les conceptions protestantes’, Revue d’Histoire et de Philosophie Religieuses, x (1930) 126–44.Google Scholar
  24. Sturmberger, Hans, Georg Erasmus Tschernembl. Religion, Libertät und Widerstand. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Gegenreformation und des Landes ob der Enns (Cologne, 1953).Google Scholar
  25. Vahle, H., ‘Calvinismus und Demokratie im Spiegel der Forschung’, Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte, lxvi (1975) 182–212.Google Scholar
  26. Idem, Die Wittenberger Theologie und die Politik der evangelischen Stände. Studien zu Luthers Gutachten in politischen Fragen (Gütersloh, 1977).Google Scholar
  27. Wolzendorff, Kurt, Staatsrecht und Naturrecht in der Lehre vom Wider- standsrecht des Volkes gegen rechtswidrige Ausübung der Staatsgewalt. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des modernen Staatsgedankens (1916, reprinted Aalen, 1961).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© School of Slavonic and East European Studies 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Winfried Schulze

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations