Abstract
In 1888 a pamphlet was published in Europe whose authors declared that the Russian Church was facing a doctrinal crisis. Perhaps an effort of the Society of Jesus, the work concluded that the scholarly exchanges of the early 1870s between the German Old Catholics and some Orthodox theologians inspired a questioning among Russian participants about important Orthodox dogmatic teachings. The central issue concerned the dogma of the procession of the Holy Spirit (filioque). The crisis was induced by an inability of the Russians to accept all their former traditions in the light of the superior logic and historical understanding of western theologians.1 The publication was denounced in St Petersburg as a falsity typical of the Jesuits. The Orthodox faithful were assured that traditional Eastern instructions on the Trinity were intact, and that the Old Catholics had presented nothing that required change.2 By 1890, however, it was quite clear that the Russians were quarrelling over the filioque and also over other dogmatic and ecclesiastical matters. They denied, of course, that a crisis had broken out. In his memoirs, Georges Florovsky referred to the debate as merely a vigorous controversy, and N. N. Glubokovskii insisted that it was only a sympathetic discussion, in spite of some signs of extreme intransigency.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Vasilii Livanskii, Protopresviter Ianyshev i novyi doktrinal’nyi krizis v russkoi tserkvi: otvet g. Bogorodskomu (Freiburg: 1888) pp. iv–vi, 19.
A. Gusev, ‘Iezuitskiia apologii filiokvisticheskago ucheniia’, in Vera i tserkov, iv (April 1900) pp. 523–5.
N.N. Glubokovskii, Russkaia bogoslovskaiia nauka v eia istoricheskom razvitia; i noveishem sostoianii (Warsaw: 1928) p. 12.
Olga Novikoff, Russian Memoirs (London: 1917) p. 1.
A. A. Kireev, Sochineniia, ed. D. N. Iakshich, 2 vols (St Petersburg: 1912);
John D. Basil, ‘Russian Orthodox Response to the Old Catholics, 1870–1905’, in Dennis J. Dunn (ed.), Religion and Nationalism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union (Boulder: 1987) p. 68.
K. P. Pobedonostsev i ego korrespondenty: pis’ma i zapiskii, ed. M. N. Pokrovsky, i (Moscow: 1923) p. 180.
V. A. Sokolov, ‘Pamiati A. A. Kireeva’, in Bogoslovskii vestnik, xx (Sergiev Posad: September 1911) 3, p. 179.
E. K. Smirnova, K starokatolicheskomu voprosu: pravoslaven li intercommunion, predlagaemyi nam starokatolikami? (Kharkov: 1894)
A. Kireev, ‘Po povodu knigi o. protoiereia E. K. Smirnova: “K staro-katolicheskomu voprosu”. Pravoslaven li Intercommunion, predlagaemyi nam Staro-katolikami?’, in Bogoslovskii vestnik, iii (Sergiev Posad: May 1894) pp. 330–4, 338, 341.
I. L. Ianyshev, ‘Pravda li, chto starokatoliki predlagaiut nam pravoslavynm intercommunion (vzaimoprichashchenie) i s nim— protestantizm?’, in Tserkovnyi vestnik, xi and xii (St Petersburg: March 1894) pp. 164–5, 179.
A. P. Mal’tsev, ‘Starokatolitsizm i pravoslavie’, Vera i tserkov, iv (May 1902) 5, p. 701.
Additional comments by Mal’tsev appeared in ‘Altkatholicismus und Orthodoxie’, Germania, CLXXX (Berlin: 10 August 1898).
Episkop Sergii, ‘Chto nas razdeliaet so starokatolikami?’, Tserkovnyi vestnik, ILIV, and ILV (St Petersburg: October, November 1902) pp. 1379, 1409–15).
A. Kirejew, ‘Ein Versuch zur Verständigung Antwort an Bischof Sergius’, in Revue Internationale de Théologie, XLVI (Berne: April–June 1904) pp. 191–3.
[I. L. Ianyshev], ‘Eshche raz—k raz”iasneniiu’, in Tserkovnyi vestnik, xxxiii (St Petersburg: August 1902) pp. 1025–7.
Wilhelm Kahle, Westliche Orthodoxie: Leben und Ziele Julian Joseph Overbecks (Leiden: 1968) p. 141.
Richard Haugh, Photius and the Carolingians, the Trinitarian Controversy (Belmont, Mass.: 1975) pp. 25–9.
One can also examine Martino Jugie, De Processione Spiritus Sancti: ex Fontibus Revelations et Secundum Orientales Dissidentes (Rome: 1936) pp. 378–9,
as well as the Greeks themselves in Grigoriou tou palama: Suggrammata, ed. B. Bobrinsky, P. Papaeuaggelou, I. Meyendorff and P. Khristou (Thessalonika: 1962) p. 23.
Episkop Sergii, ‘Chto nas razdeliaet so starokatolikami?’, in Tserkovnyi vestnik, XLXXX (St Petersburg: October 1902) p. 1347.
Arkhimandrit Sil’vestr, Otvet pravoslavnago na predlozhennuiu starokatolikami skhemu o sviatom dukhe (Kiev: 1875) pp. 1–19.
A. L. Katansky, ‘Ob iskhozhdenii Sv. Dukha (po povodu starokatolicheskago voprosa)’, in Khristianskoe chtenie, LXXIII (St Petersburg: May–June 1893) pp. 401–25.
A. Kireev, ‘K starokatolicheskomu voprosu’, in Bogoslovskii vestnik, vi (Sergiev Posad: February 1897) p. 325,
[I. L. Ianyshev], ‘Eshche raz—k raz”iasneniiu’, in Tserkovnyi vestnik, XXXII, xxxiii, xxxiv (St Petersburg: August 1902).
A. Gusev, ‘K starokatolicheskomu voprosu: pis’mo A. A. Kireevu’, in Khristianskoe chtenie, LXXVII (St Petersburg: May 1897) pp. 733–71.
A. Gusev, ‘Tezisy po voprosu o Filioque i presushchestvlenii’, in Pravoslavnyi sobesednik (Kazan: January 1901) pp. 3–39.
A. Gusev, ‘Fal’shiviashchee upriamstvo v otstaivanii Filioque i v otverzhenii presushchestvleniia’, in Vera i razum, Kharkov, ix (May 1900) pp. 504–5.
A. Gusev, ‘Fal’shiviashchee upriamstvo v otstaivannii Filioque i v otverzhenii presushchestvleniia’, in Vera i razum, Kharkov, xi (June 1900) pp. 666–70.
V. A. Kerensky, ‘K starokatolicheskomu voprosu’, in Khristianskoe chtenie, LXXXIV (St Petersburg: July, September 1904) pp. 112–28, 387–409.
A. Brilliantov, ‘Trudy prof. V. V. Bolotóva po voprosu o Filioque i polemika o ego “Tezisakh o Filioque” v russkoi literature’, in Khristianskoe chtenie, xcii (St Petersburg: April 1913) p. 445.
V. K. Sokolov, ‘Mozhno-li priznat zakonnost ierarkhiu starokatolikov’, in Bogoslovskii vestnik, ii (Sergiev Posad: April 1893) pp. 111, 116.
A. Gusev, ‘Otvet A. A. Kireevu po starokatolicheskomu voprosu o “Filioque” i “Presushchestvlenii”‘, in Vera i razum, xv (Kharkov: August 1897) p. 203.
A. Gusev, ‘Otvet starokatolicheskomu zhurnalu: Nemetskii merkurii’, in Vera i razum, xiii (Kharkov: July 1897) p. 39,
A. Gusev, ‘Fal’shiviashchee upriamstvo v otstaivanii Filioque i v otverzhenii presushchestvleniia’, in Vera i razum, xiii (Kharkov: July 1900) p. 45.
P. A. Palmieri, ‘Le teorie del Generale Alessandro Kireev sul’unione delle Chiese’, in Bessarione, ix (Rome: 1912) 3, p. 200.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 School of Slavonic and East European Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Basil, J.D. (1991). Alexander Kireev and Theological Controversy in the Russian Orthodox Church, 1890–1910. In: Hosking, G.A. (eds) Church, Nation and State in Russia and Ukraine. Studies in Russia and East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21566-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21566-9_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21568-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21566-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)