Skip to main content

Considering Alternatives

  • Chapter
John Hick’s Theodicy
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

A conversation between mythologies forms part of this book. John Hick now sees the Irenaean theodicy (including classical Christian theism) as a myth which evokes an appropriate response to life. I see process theology in similar terms. As a process humanist (or naturalist), I don’t think process theism is literally true (though it might be), but I do see it as ethicially superior to the Irenaean theodicy — as a better myth. In effect, then, there are four views defended in this dialogue between Hick and me: Hick on (1) the Real and (2) the Irenaean theodicy, and I on (3) process theism and (4) process humanism. The purpose of this chapter is to bring that conversation into clearer focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cf. John B. Cobb, Jr, The Structure of Christian Existence, (New York: Seabury Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. This is very much like Hick’s view that God has created the right kind of physical environment for the soul-making process to occur, and Barry Whitney has embraced this parallel in his study, Evil and the Process God. (Edwin Meilen Press, New York and Toronto, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel Day Williams, ‘How Does God Act?’, in B. E. Meland, ed., The Future of Empirical Theology, (Chicago, U. of Chicago Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henry Nelson Wieman, Man’s Ultimate Commitment (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1958), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wieman, The Source of Human Good, (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1945), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Bernard Loomer, ‘Two Conceptions of Power’, in Criterion (Chicago: The University of Chicago Divinity School, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 C. Robert Mesle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mesle, C.R. (1991). Considering Alternatives. In: John Hick’s Theodicy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21435-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics