Abstract
I begin from the premise that literary criticism must first pose the necessary questions about a work and that each work generates its own line of inquiry. The major questions to ask when teaching or writing about Ulysses are what does it signify and how does it signify? Can we reconcile its symbolic implications and its vast historical and literary scope with its nominalistic texture of experience — experience that often has its origin in the life of Joyce? How can a novel that takes its significance from the author’s biography be discussed? Does it have aesthetic autonomy? Can we discover something about its form that tells us what kind of novel we are reading and helps us define its approach to representation? Is the naturalistic novel of the experience of Leopold Bloom and Stephen Dedalus on one ordinary if possibly important day at odds both with the novel’s pretensions as the modern epic and its insistence that the experiences of Stephen and Bloom reiterate those of major figures of the past? How does Joyce’s obsession with the scheme of the novel — with each chapter’s organs, colours, techniques, symbols, and correspondences to mythic and historical figures — reinforce, but also at times undermine both the metaphorical implications and the basic story and characterization?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ralph Rader, “Exodus and Return: Joyce’s Ulysses and the Fiction of the Actual”, The University of Toronto Quarterly, 48:2 (Winter 1978/9) 149–71; see, p. 152.
Richard Ellmann, James Joyce (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982; orig. ed. 1959) pp. 358.
Jacques Derrida, “The Supplement of Copula: Philosophy Before Linguistics”, in Josue Harari, Textual Strategies (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1979) p. 83.
Quoted in Richard Ellmann, James Joyce, p. 163; from My Brother’s Keeper, ed. Richard Ellmann (New York: The Viking Press, 1958) pp. 103–4.
T. S. Eliot, “Ulysses, Order, and Myth”, The Dial 35 (1923) 480–3.
Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1982), from Derrida, Marges p. 301.
See Ellmann, Ulysses on the Ley (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972) p. 154–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 Daniel R. Schwarz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwarz, D.R. (1987). Joyce as “Lord and Giver” of Language: Form and Metaphor in Ulysses. In: Reading Joyce’s Ulysses. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21414-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21414-3_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-55613-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21414-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)