Advertisement

Infanticide, I

  • Clement Dore

Abstract

7.1 It may be thought that even non-standard desire-utilitarianism should be rejected on the ground that it cannot account for the obvious prima facie wrongness of killing unwanted neonates, who do not yet have a concept of themselves as continuing entities and, hence, cannot yet desire continued life. Now, I think that in fact there is a strong prima facie case against killing unwanted neonates, but in recent years a number of philosophers, most notably, Michael Tooley,1 have defended infanticide; and we need at this point to examine the best of those defences. If they are in fact sound, then, of course, desire-utilitarianism need not account for the putative wrongness of infanticide.

Keywords

Depressed Patient Sexual Maturity Human Infant Walk Away Continue Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Michael Tooley, ‘A Defense of Abortion and Infanticide’, in Joel Feinberg (ed.), The Problem of Abortion, 1st edn (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1973) pp. 51–91Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Clement Dore 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clement Dore
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations