Ricardian Equivalence Theorem

  • Andrew B. Abel
Part of the The New Palgrave book series (NPA)

Abstract

The Ricardian Equivalence Theorem is the proposition that the method of financing any particular path of government expenditure is irrelevant. More precisely, the choice between levying lump-sum taxes and issuing government bonds to finance government spending does not affect the consumption of any household nor does it affect capital formation. The fundamental logic underlying this argument was presented by David Ricardo in Chapter XVII (‘Taxes on Other Commodities than Raw Produce’) of The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1821). Although Ricardo clearly explained why government borrowing and taxes could be equivalent, he warned against accepting the argument on its face: ‘From what I have said, it must not be inferred that I consider the system of borrowing as the best calculated to defray the extraordinary expenses of the state. It is a system which tends to make us less thrifty — to blind us to our real situation’ (1960, pp. 162–3).

Keywords

Income Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abel, A.B. 1986. Capital accumulation and uncertain lifetimes with adverse selection. Econometrica 54(5), September, 1079–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, M.J. 1971. National Income and the Price Level. 2nd edn, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R.J. 1974. Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82(6), November—December, 1095–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsky, R.B., Mankiw, G.N. and Zeldes, S.P. 1986. Ricardian consumers with Keynesian propensities. American Economic Review 76(4), September, 676–91.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, J.M. 1958. Public Principles of Public Debt. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J.M. 1976. Barro on the Ricardian equivalence theorem. Journal of Political Economy 84(2), April, 337–42.Google Scholar
  7. Carmichael, J. 1982. On Barro’s theorem and debt neutrality: the irrelevance of net wealth. American Economic Review 72(1), March, 202–13.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, L.K.C. 1983. Uncertainty and the neutrality of government financing policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 11, May, 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drazen, A. 1978. Government debt, human capital and bequests in a lifecycle model. Journal of Political Economy 86, June, 337–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldstein, M.S. 1976. Perceived wealth in bonds and social security: a comment. Journal of Political Economy 84(2), April, 331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Patinkin, D. 1965. Money, Interest and Prices, 2nd edn, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Ricardo, D. 1821. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: M. Dent & Sons, 1911. Reprinted, 1960.Google Scholar
  13. Tobin, J. 1980. Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Weil, P. 1984. ‘Love thy children’: reflections on the Barro debt neutrality theorem. Mimeo, Harvard University, October. Forthcoming in Journal of Monetary Economics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew B. Abel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations