Skip to main content

Local Action to Limit Harm

  • Chapter
Alcohol and the Public Health
  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

A good deal can be done at a local level to prevent alcohol-related problems and to limit the harm incurred. Prevention work may be classified as primary, secondary or tertiary. In the context of alcohol-related harm, primary prevention is focused on people who have not yet experienced such harm, usually children or young adults. Secondary prevention is concerned with the drinking population, many of whom will have experienced transient or reversible harm, which may range from an inconvenient hangover to a driving disqualification. Tertiary prevention focuses on identified problem drinkers who have suffered appreciable harm and for whom the aim is to limit further damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Robinson, ‘Alcohol problems (1) Prevention at the local level’, Health Trends, 19(1987) pp. 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oxford City Council and Oxfordshire Health Authority, A balanced Alcohol Strategy for Oxford (Oxford: Oxford City Council, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Robinson, ‘Alcohol, education and action: shifting emphases’, Health Education Research, 1(1986) pp. 325–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Health/Home Office, Departmental Circular on Alcohol Misuse, HN (89) 4; LAC (89) 6; HN (FP) (89) 4 (London: HMSO, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Tether and D. Robinson, Alcohol Problems. A guide to local action (London: Tavistock, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Robinson, P. Tether and J. Teller, Local action on alcohol problems (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B.N. Kinder, N.E. Pape and S. Walfish, ‘Drug and alcohol education programmes: a review of outcome studies’, International Journal of Addictions, 15(1980) pp. 1035–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Dorn, ‘Youth culture in the U.K: implications for health education’, Institute of Health Education, 14(1981) pp. 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alcohol Concern, Alcohol-free bars (London: Alcohol Concern, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.G. Lucas, ‘Alcohol in industry’, British Medical Journal, 294(1987) pp. 460–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Dickensen, Drink and drugs at work: The consuming problem (Institute of Personnel Management, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Health Education Authority, Guidelines for local authorities in the development, implementation and evaluation of an alcohol policy for their staff (London: Health Education Authority, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. D. Bacon, ‘On the prevention of alcohol problems and alcoholism’, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 39(1978) pp. 1125–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. M. Mather and D. H. Marjot, ‘Alcohol-related admission to a psychiatric hospital: a comparison of Asians and Europeans’, British Journal of Addiction, 84(1989) pp. 327–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Baldwyn and N. Heather, ‘Alcohol education courses for offenders: A survey of British agencies’, Alcohol and Alcoholism, 22(1987) pp. 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. H. Maslow, ‘Theory of Human Motivation’, Psychological Review, 50(1943) pp. 370–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Faculty of Public Health Medicine, Royal Colleges of Physicians

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemm, J. (1991). Local Action to Limit Harm. In: Alcohol and the Public Health. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21280-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21280-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-54779-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21280-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics