Skip to main content

Abstract

In continental western Europe, as in the UK and the USA, the political problem of managing radioactive wastes arrived by stealth. In the early years of development of nuclear energy as a soi-disant, cheap, safe and clean source of power the drawbacks, particularly the gradual accumulation of long-lived dangerous radioactive wastes, were largely discounted. As the nuclear programmes of various countries expanded so wastes accumulated and the technical problem of their management had to be tackled. At the same time throughout Western Europe (and increasingly in Eastern Europe too1) there has been growing concern about the health and environmental risks from radioactive wastes. Failure to secure public support for waste management policies would be a major factor in limiting the development even continuance of the nuclear energy option. Thus the political stakes in the radioactive waste issue are high. Radioactive waste became an increasing source of political conflict in several Western European countries during the 1980s, especially in the aftermath of the Chernobyl accident in 1986.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mackay, L., and Thompson, M. (eds), Something in the Wind: politics after Chernobyl (Pluto Press, London, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salander, C., Proske, R., and Albrecht, E., ‘The Asse Salt Mine. The World’s only test facility for the disposal of radioactive waste’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 5, 1980, No. 4, pp. 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Petroll, M., ‘Taking the “worry” out of the back end of the Fuel Cycle’, Nuclear Europe, Vol. 7, No. 1-2, January/February 1987a, pp. 25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nau, H. R., National Politics and International Technology; nuclear reactor development in Western Europe (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelkin, D., and Pollak, M., The Atom Besieged: extraparliamentary dissent in France and Germany (London, MIT Press, 1981a).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cervenka, Z., and Rogers, B., The Nuclear Axis: secret collaboration between West Germany and South Africa (London, Julia Friedman Books, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Palmer, J., Europe Without America? The crisis in Atlantic Relations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly, P., Fighting for Hope (London, Chatto and Windus, Hogarth Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsch, H., ‘Gorleben: winning the battle, losing the war?’, Nature, 24 May 1979, Vol. 279, p. 283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hopfner, K., ‘Germany to decentralise nuclear waste treatment’, Nature, 1 October 1979, Vol. 281, p. 419.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Letter from Transnuclear, Inc (USA), to Charles R. Head, Operations Division of US Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, dated 5 July 1984. Reprinted in Public Comments on the Draft Mission Plan for the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program, Vol. III, June 1985, DOE/RW-0005, p. 249

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dickman, S., ‘Nuclear Waste may go East’, Nature, vol. 334, 18 August 1988b, p. 557.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abrams, N., ‘Nuclear Politics in Sweden’, Environment, May 1979, Vol. 21 (4), pp. 6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barnaby, W., ‘The Swedish Referendum: Do away with it but not yet’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 36, No. 6, June 1980, pp. 58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abrahamson, D., ‘Governments fall as consensus gives way to debate’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 35, No. 11 1979, pp. 30–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andersson, K., Larssen, A., and Wingefors, S., ‘Sweden: policy and licensing — an update of projects and the new framework for regulation’, IAEA Bulletin, 1986, Vol. 28, No. 1, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MacLachlan, A., ‘French PWR Health’, Nucleonics Week, Vol. 30, No. 9, 2 March 1989, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feldman, D. L., ‘Public Choice Theory Applied to National Energy Policy: The Case of France’ in Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1986, pp. 137–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Andrew Blowers, David Lowry, Barry D. Solomon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blowers, A., Lowry, D., Solomon, B.D. (1991). Nuclear Waste in Western Europe. In: The International Politics of Nuclear Waste. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21246-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics