The Betweenness of Place

  • J. Nicholas Entrikin
Part of the Critical Human Geography book series (CHG)


The geographer’s concept of specific place draws attention to the relation between particularizing and universalizing discourses and between subjective and objective perspectives. Specific place refers to the conceptual fusion of space and experience that gives areas of the earth’s surface a “wholeness” or an “individuality.” I shall introduce this concept by first offering a general overview of the idea of place as context, a view that incorporates both the existential qualities of our experience of place and also our sense of place as a natural “object” in the world. This dualistic quality of place has been at the center of the conception of geography as a chorological science that addresses the relationship of people to their environment.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Anne Buttimer, Society and Milieu in the French Geographic Tradition (Chicago: Rand McNally and Company for the Association of American Geographers, 1971).Google Scholar
  2. Vincent Berdoulay, “Place, Meaning, and Discourse in French Language Geography,” in John Agnew and James Duncan (eds) The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 124–39Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yi-Fu Tuan, Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robert D. Sack, Conceptions of Space in Social Thought: A Geographic Perspective (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas Nagel, The View from Nowhere (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985), p. 111.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Michael Sandel, “Introduction,” in Michael Sandel (ed.) Liberalism and its Critics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    The political theorist Michael Walzer has described the non-reducible cultural quality of our moral agency in his discussion of justice: By virtue of what characteristics are we one another’s equals? One characteristic above all is central to my argument. We are (all of us) culture-producing creatures; we make and inhabit meaningful worlds. Since there is no way to rank and order these worlds with regard to their understanding of social goods, we do justice to actual men and women by respecting their particular creations. And they claim justice, and resist tyranny, by insisting on the meaning of social goods among themselves. Justice is rooted in the distinct understandings of places, honors, jobs, things of all sorts, that constitute a shared way of life. To override those understandings is (always) to act unjustly. Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983), p. 314.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Thomas Nagel, Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 196–213.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    J. Nicholas Entrikin, “Geography’s Spatial Perspective and the Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer,” The Canadian Geographer, vol. 21, 1977, pp. 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 15.
    T. Nagel, The View from Nowhere, p. 57 n.1. See also John Urry, “Social Relations, Space and Time,” in Derek Gregory and John Urry (eds) Social Relations and Spatial Structures (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1985), pp. 21–48.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Yi-Fu Tuan, “Space and Place: Humanistic Perspective,” in Progress in Geography, vol. 6, 1974, pp. 213–52Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    Paul Ricoeur has defined narrative as the synthesis of heterogeneous phenomena, and I have borrowed his wording to describe the task of the geographer. Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  14. Richard Hartshorne, The Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in Light of the Past (Lancaster, Pa.: Association of American Geographers, 1939).Google Scholar
  15. Torsten Hägerstrand, “Presence and Absence: A Look at Conceptual Choices and Bodily Necessities,” Regional Studies, vol. 18, 1984, pp. 373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 19.
    For a discussion of the semantic density of place names see Roland Barthes, “Proust and Names,” in New Critical Essays, translated by Richard Howard (New York: Hill and Wang, 1980), pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Ernst Cassirer, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Vol. 2 Mythical Thought (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    R. Hartshorne, The Nature of Geography, pp. 40–84; George Tatham, “Geography in the Nineteenth Century,” in Griffith Taylor (ed.) Geography in the Twentieth Century: The Study of Growth, Fields, Techniques, Aims and Trends (London: Methuen, 1951), pp. 28–69.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    M. M. Bakhtin, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, translated by Vera W. McGee and edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986), pp. 44–5.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    M. M. Bakhtin, Speech Genres, p. 42; Bakhtin refers to this space-time whole as a “chronotope,” and although his primary concern is with a theory of literary genres, it is a useful term for capturing the sense of space-time “wholes” that have fascinated both geographers and historians. M. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination, translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), pp. 84–258.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    For a discussion of Sauer and natural science see J. Nicholas Entrikin, “Carl O. Sauer, Philosopher in Spite of Himself,” Geographical Review, vol. 74, 1984, pp. 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michael Williams, “‘The Apple of My Eye’: Carl Sauer and Historical Geography,” Journal of Historical Geography, vol. 9, 1983, pp. 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Michael Solot, “Carl Sauer and Cultural Evolution,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 76, 1986, pp. 508–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin Kenzer, “Milieu and the ‘Intellectual Landscape’: Carl O. Sauer’s Undergraduate Heritage,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 75, 1985, pp. 258–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herder in “Historicism: The Disciplinary World of Carl O. Sauer,” in Martin Kenzer (ed.) Carl O. Sauer: a Tribute (Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 1987), pp. 11–39.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Hans Vaihinger, The Philosophy of the ‘As If’, translated by C.K. Ogden (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1925)Google Scholar
  27. J. Nicholas Entrikin, “Robert Park’s Human Ecology and Human Geography,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 70, 1980, pp. 43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 26.
    Vincent Berdoulay, “The Vidal-Durkheim Debate,” in David Ley and Marwyn S. Samuels (eds) Humanistic Geography: Prospects and Problems (Chicago: Maaroufa Press, 1978), pp. 77–90Google Scholar
  29. F. Lukermann, “Geography as a Formal Intellectual Discipline and the Way in which It Contributes to Human Knowledge,” The Canadian Geographer, vol. 8, 1964, pp. 167–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 27.
    F. Lukermann, “The ‘Calcul des Probabilités’ and the École Française de Géographie,” The Canadian Geographer, vol. 9, 1965, pp. 128–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 28.
    Allan Pred, Place, Practice and Structure: Social and Spatial Transformation in Southern Sweden: 1750–1850 (Totowa, N.J.: Barnes and Noble, 1986).Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    Torsten Hägerstrand, “Survival and Arena: on the Life-History of Individuals in Relation to their Geographic Environment,” in Tommy Carlstein, Don Parkes and Nigel Thrift (eds) Human Activity and Time-Geography: Vol. 2, Timing Space and Spacing Time (London: Edward Arnold, 1978), pp. 122–45Google Scholar
  33. G. P. Chapman, Human and Environmental Systems: A Geographer’s Appraisal (London: Academic Press, 1977)Google Scholar
  34. R. J. Bennett and R. J. Chorley, Environmental Systems: Philosophy, Analysis and Control (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  35. 30.
    David Lowenthal notes the similarities between the geographer’s view of the world and that of the individual actor in everyday life in recognizing that the geographer, more than other scientists, “observes and analyzes aspects of the milieu on the scale and in the categories that they are usually apprehended in everyday life.” David Lowenthal, “Geography, Experience, and Imagination: Towards a Geographical Epistemology,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 51, 1961, pp. 241–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 31.
    The connection between knowledge and human interests has been reiterated in geography throughout the twentieth century, first in the interpretations of neo-Kantianism and more recently in references to the philosophical arguments of Jürgen Habermas. For example, Richard Hartshorne, The Nature of Geography, and Derek Gregory, Ideology, Science and Human Geography (London: Hutchinson, 1978).Google Scholar
  37. See also Max Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, translated and edited by Edward Shils and Henry Finch (New York: The Free Press, 1949)Google Scholar
  38. Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, translated by Jeremy Shapiro (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
  39. 32.
    David Carr makes a similar distinction concerning historical narratives in his work, Time, Narrative, and History (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1986), pp. 171–2.Google Scholar
  40. 33.
    Vincent Berdoulay, La formation de l’école française de géographie (1870–1914) (Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale, 1981)Google Scholar
  41. 34.
    John Fraser Hart, “The Highest Form of the Geographer’s Art,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 72, 1982, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 35.
    Hayden White, Topics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    J. F. Unstead, J. L. Myres, P. M. Roxby and D. Stamp, “Classifications of Regions of the World,” Geography, vol. 22, 1937, pp. 253–82.Google Scholar
  44. 39.
    Brian Berry, “Approaches to Regional Analysis: A Synthesis,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 54, 1964, pp. 2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. William Bunge, “Gerrymandering, Geography, and Grouping,” Geographical Review, vol. 56, 1966, pp. 256–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stephen Gale and Michael Atkinson, “On the Set Theoretic Foundations of the Regionalization Problem,” in Stephen Gale and Gunnar Olsson (eds) Philosophy in Geography (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1979), pp. 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 40.
    J. Nicholas Entrikin, “Humanism, Naturalism, and Geographical Thought,” Geographical Analysis, vol. 17, 1985, pp. 243–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 41.
    Heinrich Rickert, The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences, edited and translated by Guy Oakes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  49. 43.
    Denis Cosgrove, Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape (Totowa, N.J.: Barnes and Noble, 1985), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  50. 44.
    David Thomas, Naturalism and Social Science: A Post-Empiricist Philosophy of Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  51. 45.
    May Brodbeck, “Meaning and Action,” in May Brodbeck (ed.) Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, (New York: Macmillan, 1968), pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
  52. 46.
    Stephen Daniels, “Arguments for a Humanistic Geography,” in R. J. Johnston (ed.) The Future of Geography (London: Methuen, 1985), pp. 143–58Google Scholar
  53. 48.
    For example, see John Agnew, Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society (Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987)Google Scholar
  54. Derek Gregory, Regional Transformation and Industrial Revolution: A Geography of the Yorkshire Woollen Industry (London: Macmillan, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. R. J. Johnston, “The World Is Our Oyster,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, new series, vol. 9, 1984, pp. 443–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Anssi Paasi, “The Institutionalization of Regions: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Emergence of Regions and the Constitution of Regional Identity,” Fennia, vol. 164, 1986, pp. 105–46Google Scholar
  57. Nigel Thrift, “On the Determination of Social Action in Space and Time,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 1, 1983, pp. 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 49.
    Anne Gilbert, “The New Regional Geography in English and French-Speaking Countries,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 12, 1988, pp. 208–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mary Beth Pudup, “Arguments within Regional Geography,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 12, 1988, pp. 369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 50.
    Doreen Massey and John Allen, Geography Matters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 51.
    Doreen Massey, Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (New York: Methuen, 1984), pp. 299–300.Google Scholar
  62. 52.
    J. Agnew, Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society, p. 42; see also Barney Warf, “Regional Transformation, Everyday Life, and Pacific Northwest Lumber Production,” Annals of the Association of American Geographer’s, vol. 78, 1988, pp. 326–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 53.
    Jeffrey C. Alexander, Action and Its Environments: Towards a New Synthesis (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988), pp. 301–33.Google Scholar
  64. 54.
    Andrew Sayer, “Explanation in Economic Geography: Abstraction versus Generalization,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 6, 1982, pp. 68–88Google Scholar
  65. 55.
    Alan Warde, “Review of Place, Practice and Structure by Allan Pred,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 77, 1987, pp. 484–6.Google Scholar
  66. 56.
    Louis O. Mink, “The Autonomy of Historical Understanding,” History and Theory, vol. 5, 1966, pp. 24–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 57.
    P. Ricoeur, Time and Narrative. The models of narrative understanding discussed by Ricoeur and Mink have been offered as models for fields other than history. For example, Donald E. Polkinghorne uses the literature from the philosophy of history and narratology to discuss psychology. He argues that the traditional division in psychology between theory and practice is mediated through narrative knowledge. Donald E. Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  68. 58.
    Robert Scholes and Robert Kellogg, The Nature of Narrative (London: Oxford University Press, 1966), p. 4.Google Scholar
  69. 60.
    The mimetic function of narrative has been characterized in seemingly contradictory ways. For example, it has been viewed as an essentially conservative force by Roland Barthes. He has argued that mimesis artificially constrains meaning and confirms the already existing order of things. It has also been viewed as a form of invention, a means of creating meaning. For example, Paul Ricoeur has noted these creative aspects of mimesis that are part of the human attempt to know the world through the redescription of experience. The imitation of the relation of humans in the world is fundamental to our sense of geographic description in both everyday and scientific discourse. Both are a form of human practice that seeks to describe the world in familiar and shared symbols. Such descriptions may easily be shaped by ideologies and personal concerns, but as Christopher Prendergast has argued in his discussion of mimesis: These [shared and familiar] images and representations may, under the pressure of a certain type of analysis, be shown as embodying a large portion of illusion (‘misrecognition’); in the perspectives opened up by the holy trinity, Nietzsche, Freud and Marx, they may be ‘fictions’ serving particular desires, interests and ideologies. But, in other ways, they are also arguably indispensable to any conceivable social reality or what Wittgenstein calls a ‘form of life’...; and perhaps the supreme illusion would be in the assumption that we could live entirely without them, in a euphoric movement of ‘unbound’ desire and ‘infinite’ semiosis. The mimetic activity that is closest to that of the construction of place is similar to the plots that are created in the narration of historical events. Christopher Prendergast, The Order of Mimesis: Balzac, Stendhal, Nerval, Flaubert (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 7.Google Scholar
  70. 63.
    Veyne states further that: Practically, the aggregation of points of view is done in confusion, either by surreptitiously jumping from one point of view to another in the course of the account, or by cutting out from the continuum for the sake of a point of view arbitrarily or naively chosen (whether inspired by toponomastics or by administrative geography). In geography and in history, the idea of subjectivity — of liberty and equality of points of view — brings a definitive clarification and tolls the knell of historicism. On the other hand, it does not follow (and Marrou protests against this confusion) that what has happened in time is subjective; just as nothing is more objective than the earth’s surface, the object of geography. Geography and history are nominalisms: whence the impossibility of a history à la Toynbee and of a geography à la Ritter, for whom regions or civilizations really exist and are not a question of points of view. Paul Veyne, Writing History: Essay on Epistemology (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1984), pp. 296–7Google Scholar
  71. 64.
    Hayden White, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), p. 1.Google Scholar
  72. See also Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
  73. Derek Gregory “Areal Differentiation and Post-Modern Human Geography,” in Derek Gregory and Rex Walford (eds) New Horizons in Human Geography (London: Macmillan, 1989), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
  74. 66.
    See, for example, H. C. Darby, “The Problem of Historical Description,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 30, 1962, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© J. Nicholas Entrikin 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Nicholas Entrikin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations