From Biko to Wendy Orr: the Problem of Medical Accountability in Contexts of Political Violence and Torture
Since the 1960s the white minority government of South Africa has used detention without charge or trial to crush opposition to its apartheid policies. Beginning with the ‘90-day detention’ law of 1963 and culminating in the detention clauses of the 1967 Terrorism Act, the police eventually gained the right to detain a person incommunicado and indefinitely without trial for the purposes of interrogation. Under Section 6 of the Terrorism Act, the police were permitted to detain a person until he/she ‘has satisfactorily replied to all questions at the said interrogation or that no useful purpose will be served by his further detention’. The courts of law were explicitly denied the power to pronounce upon the validity of any action taken under this section or to order the release of any detainee. Section 6 denied to anyone other than a handful of government officials the right of access to or information about any detainee.
KeywordsPolitical Violence South African Medical Journal Security Police Federal Council Medical Accountability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.John Dugard, Human Rights and the South African Legal Order ( New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1978 ) pp. 294–302.Google Scholar
- 3.Amnesty International, Political Imprisonment in South Africa ( London: Amnesty International, 1978 ) pp. 58–75.Google Scholar
- 89.Eric Stover and Michael Nelson, ‘Medical Action Against Torture’, in Eric Stover and Elena Nightingale (eds), The Breaking of Bodies and Minds: Torture, Psychiatric Abuse and the Health Professions ( New York: W. H. Freeman & Co., 1985 ), p. 119.Google Scholar
- 93.Eric Stover, The Open Secret: Torture and the Medical Profession in Chile ( Washington DC, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1987 ).Google Scholar