Advertisement

Israel’s Project Renewal: Describing and Explaining a Relative Success

  • Naomi Carmon
Part of the Policy Studies Organization Series book series (PSOS)

Abstract

Government-initiated neighborhood-targeted programs have frequently been in the focus of public attention since the Second World War. Limiting our survey to the American experience, salient landmarks are Urban Renewal, Model Cities and Block Grants for Community Development. Urban Renewal was sharply criticized during its time (Anderson, 1964; Gans, 1965). Even though thirty years later, one can observe impressive developments in what were once Urban Renewal areas, the social costs of evacuation, demolition, relocation and a very long process of redevelopment are considered too high to justify its method. Model Cities, with all its good intentions, barely had a chance to prove its potential, and is generally evaluated as a non-success endeavor (Frieden and Kaplan, 1975). The more recent CDBG program, which transferred decision-making power from Washington to local mayors and their staffs, also came under attack when the latter were accused of not targeting grants to the problems and populations with which the program was designed to deal (McFarland, 1978).

Keywords

Urban Renewal Project Renewal Model City Israeli Society Social Disparity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, Ernest R. (1979), ‘Institutional factors in the process of neighborhood deterioration’, in Naomi Carmon and Moshe Hill (eds), Neighborhood rehabilitation in Israel (Haifa: Technion, Samuel Neaman Institute) pp. 56–67.Google Scholar
  2. Alterman, Rachelle (1982), ‘Implementation analysis in urban and regional planning: toward a research agenda’, in Patsy Healey, Glen McDougall and Michael Thomas, Planning theory: prospects for the 1980s, Urban and Regional Planning Series (London: Pergamon Press) pp. 225–245.Google Scholar
  3. Alterman, Rachelle, Naomi Carmon and Moshe Hill (1984), ‘Integrated evaluation: a synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad-aim social programs’, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 18 (6), pp. 381–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alterman, Rachelle, with Moshe Hill (1985), Evaluation of the institutional structure, planning and implementation of project renewal, Research Report (Haifa: Technion, Samuel Neaman Institute) (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, Martin (1964), The federal bulldozer (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  6. Carmon, Naomi, Moshe Hill and Rachelle Alterman (1980), Multi-group integrated evaluation: a synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad-aid programs, Working Paper (Haifa: Technion, Samuel Neaman Institute).Google Scholar
  7. Carmon, Naomi and Moshe Hill (1984), ‘Project renewal: an Israeli experiment in neighborhood rehabilitation’, Habitat International 8 (2), pp. 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmon, Naomi (1985), The social and physical outcome of project renewal, Research Report (Haifa: Technion, Samuel Neaman Institute). (Hebrew)Google Scholar
  9. Carmon, Naomi and Robert Oxman (1986), ‘Responsive public housing: an alternative for low-income families’, Environment and Behaviour 18 (2), pp. 258–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmon, Naomi and Tamar Gavrieli (1987), ‘Improving housing by conventional versus self-help methods: evidence from Israel’, Urban Studies 24 (4), pp. 324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Churchman, Arza (1985), Resident participation and involvement in project renewal, Research Report (Haifa: Technion, Samuel Neaman Institute) (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  12. Davis, Dan, Dalia Sprinzak and Rina Ossizon (1982), Who benefits from the educational resources? (Jerusalem: The Ministry of Education and Culture) (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  13. Eshel, Smadar and Yochanan Peres (1973), The integration of a minority group: a causal model, Research Report (Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology).Google Scholar
  14. Finsterbusch, Kurt (1980), Understanding social impacts: assessing the effects of public projects (Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  15. Frieden, Bernard J. and Marshall Kaplan (1975), The politics of neglect: urban aid from model cities to revenue sharing (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  16. Gans, Herbert J. (1965), ‘The failure of urban renewal: a critique and some proposals’, Commentary, April, pp.29–37.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, F. K. and J. E. Prathes (1977), Does anything work: evaluating social programs (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  18. Irvin, George (1978), Modern cost-benefit methods (London: MacMillan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McFarland, M. Carter (1978), Federal government and urban problems (Boulder, Co: Westview Press).Google Scholar
  20. Minkowitz, Avraham, Dan Davis and Joseph Baschi (1977), Evaluation of the educational achievements in the Israeli elementary school (Jerusalem: Hebrew University and the Van Leer Institute) (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  21. Murray, Charles (1984), Loosing ground: American social policy 1950–1980 (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  22. Razel, Ofra (1978), Educational enrichment and welfare — for whom? (Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs) (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  23. Rossi, Peter H. and Howard E. Freeman (1982), Evaluation — a systematic approach, 2nd edn (Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  24. Thomas, John Clayton (1981), ‘“patching up” evaluation design: the case for process evaluations’, in Dennis J. Palumbo and Marvin A. Harder (eds) Implementing public policy (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books) pp. 91–8.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, M. (1980), Benefit — cost analysis for program evaluation (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  26. Titmuss, Richard (1966), ‘Social-policy and economic progress’, paper presented at the National Conference on Social Welfare (Chicago).Google Scholar
  27. Weis, Carol H. (1972), Evaluation research (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Policy Studies Organization 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naomi Carmon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations