Abstract
Given that the granting of a separate chapter to the work of I. S. Kon was justified at least partly on the grounds of the difficulty of placing him in one academic pigeon-hole, then another explanation is required for including in a single chapter the approaches of two separate disciplines, sociology and demography. There are, in fact, a number of reasons for doing so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
6 Sociological and Demographic Approaches to Sex Differences
D. Akivis and E. Mushkina, ‘Kakaya sem′ya nam nuzhna?’, report on round-table discussion on the family, in Nedelya, No. 47, 1987, p. 17.
Interview by L. Kuznetsova with A. Vishnevskii, ‘Glazami zhenshchiny’, in Novoe Vremya, No. 10, 1989, p. 33.
V. Shlapentokh, Love, Marriage and Friendship in the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1984) p. 48.
O. A. Voronina, ‘Zhenshchina v “muzhskom obshchestve”’, in Sotsiologischeskie Issledovaniya, No. 2, 1988, p. 109.
See M. Buckley, ‘Soviet Interpretations of the Woman Question’, in B. Holland (ed.) Soviet Sisterhood (London: Fourth Estate, 1985) p. 40; and
L. Attwood and M. McAndrew, ‘Women at Work in the USSR’, in M. J. Davidson and C. L. Cooper (eds), Working Women (Chichester and New York: John Wiley, 1984) pp. 286–7.
A. G. Kharchev, Nravstvennost’ i sem′ya (Moscow, 1981) p. 3.
R. Gurova, Dinamika tsennostnykh orientatsii devushek 1913–1919’, in Dinamika izmeneniya polozheniya zhenshchiny i sem’ya (Moscow, 1972) pp. 29–39.
N. Shimin, ‘Rol′ zhenshchiny-materi v emotsional′no-nravstvennom razvitii detei v sem′e’, in Dinamika izmeneniya polozheniya zhenshchiny i sem′ya (Moscow, 1972) p. 174.
E. Danilova, ‘Sotsial′naya roi′ zhenshchiny-materi’, in Dinamika izmeneniya polozheniya zhenshchiny i sem′ya (Moscow, 1972) p. 42.
M. Matskovskii and T. Gurko, ‘The Young Family: Problems of Formation’, Abstract in CDSP Vol. XXXVII, No, 5 (1984) pp. 5–6. (Originally in Molodoi Kommunist June 1984, pp. 51–7.)
V. Perevedentsev, ‘Ne soshlis’ kharakterami?’, in Literaturnaya Gazeta, 15 February 1978, p. 13.
L. Kuznetsova, ‘Kto seichas glava sem′i?’, in My i Nasha Sem’ya (Moscow, 1983), pp. 116–17.
M. S. Matskovskii, ‘Podgotovka podrostkov i molodezhi k budushchei zhizhni’, in Sem′ya i sisteme nravstvennogo vospitaniya: Aktual’nye problemy vospitaniya podrostkov (Moscow, 1979) pp. 204–13.
Yu. B. Ryurikov, ‘Deti i obshchestvo (o nekotorykh aspektakh demografischeskoi politiki)’, in Voprosy Filosofii, No. 4, 1977, pp. 111–21.
See L. Proshina, ‘Muzhchiny, beregite sebya!’, in Nedelya, 8 January 1987, p. 16.
Also Yu. B. Ryurikov, ‘Pochemu detei stanovitsya men′she?’, in Literaturnaya Gazeta, 17 November 1976, and ‘Tora zolotaya’, in Pravda, 15 May 1983, p. 3.
I. V. Bestuzhev-Lada, ‘O zhenshchine i dlya zhenshchiny’, in Rabotnitsa, No. 5, 1985, p. 26.
I. V. Bestuzhev-Lada, ‘Net detei-net i budushchego u naroda’, in Nedelya, 15–21 August 1988, p. 21.
N. Zakharova, A. Posadskaya and N. Rimashevskaya, ‘Kak my reshaem zhenskii vopros’, in Kommunist, No. 4, 1989, pp. 62–3.
M. Malysheva, ‘Postylye plody “emansipatsii”’, in Nedelya, 11–17 January 1988, p. 4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Lynne Attwood
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Attwood, L. (1990). Sociological and Demographic Approaches to Sex Differences. In: The New Soviet Man and Woman. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21030-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21030-5_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-51986-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21030-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)