Abstract
As a political theorist concerned with human emancipation I consider myself a specialist in how things ought to be, in this country, and in this world. As a social scientist, however, I am interested only in conceptions of the future that in principle appear realistically attainable, by and by, by way of reasonably non-violent strategies. This chapter will try to convince you that the idea of an evolving struggle toward a human rights world order can be seen as an essential supplement to the stagnating, stability-serving agenda of liberal democracies and as an alternative to the dangerous vision of a Marxist world revolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Clifford Orwin and Thomas Pangle, “The Philosophical Foundation of Human Rights,” in Marc F. Plattner (ed.), Human Rights in Our Time (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1984): 1–22 at 3.
Henry Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and US Foreign Policy (Princeton University Press, 1980): 119–23 at 119.
Robert Matthews and Cranford Pratt, “Human Rights and Foreign Policy: Principles and Canadian Practice,” Human Rights Quarterly 7 (2) (May 1985): 159–88 at 160.
Jack Donnelly, “Human Rights as Natural Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly 4 (3) (1982): 391–405 at 392 and 398.
Rhoda Howard, “Evaluating Human Rights in Africa: Some Problems of Implicit Comparisons,” Human Rights Quarterly 6 (2) (May 1984): 160–79 at 179.
C. B. Macpherson, The Real World of Democracy (Toronto: CBC Publications, 1965): 62.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, “The Social Contract,” in The Social Contract and Discourses Book 1 (London: Dent, 1973), Chapter 8: 178.
Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (New York: Harper & Row, 1964): 108 and 188, italics deleted.
Robert C. Tucker (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader (New York: Norton, 1972, 1978): 491, 531 and 755, 2nd edn.
Robert Michels, Political Parties (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1915, 1949).
Jurgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975).
Robert E. Lane, “The Legitimacy Bias: Conservative Man in Market and State,” in Bogdan Denitch (ed.), Legitimation of Regimes (London: Sage, 1979): 55–79.
Cf. C. Bay, “Foundations of the Liberal Make-Believe,” Inquiry, 14 (1971): 213–37.
Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).
Bertrand Russell, Which Way to Peace? (London: Michael Joseph, 1936).
John W. Burton, Deviance, Terrorism and War: The Process of Solving Unsolved Social and Political Problems (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979): 206.
C. Bay, “The Triple Insult of Poverty: Notes Toward a Study of Liberal Society,” Sociological Inquiry, 46 (1976): 223–34.
Arthur S. Miller, “Taking Needs Seriously: Observations on the Necessity for Constitutional Change,” Washington and Lee Law Review, 41 (Fall 1984): 1243–1306 at 1305.
Philip Alston, “Conjuring Up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control,” The American Journal of International Law, 78 (1984): 607–21.
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).
Cf. Asbjurn Eide, “The Human Rights Movement and the Transformation of the International Order,” Alternatives 11 (3) (July 1986): 367–402 at 386.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 John Burton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bay, C. (1990). Taking the Universality of Human Needs Seriously. In: Burton, J. (eds) Conflict: Human Needs Theory. The Conflict Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21000-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21000-8_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21002-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21000-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)