Skip to main content

Midwifery care in the first stage of labour

  • Chapter
Intrapartum Care

Part of the book series: Midwifery Practice ((MIPRA))

Abstract

The above quotations reflect the wide range of feelings expressed by mothers about their labours. This chapter is written with the intention of exploring the way in which good midwifery practice can contribute to a positive experience of labour for the mother, enabling her to enter parenthood with a sense of achievement and a degree of confidence. It is of course accepted that this outcome cannot be considered in isolation, and therefore the chapter begins by acknowledging that a safe outcome for the mother and baby is the primary objective of care in labour. Having established these two objectives, the chapter goes on to review current midwifery practice in the first stage of labour and the extent to which it contributes to these outcomes. In recent years admission procedures, including perineal shaving and the administration of enemas, have been criticised by consumer groups, and these will be considered in detail. At present, the organisation of maternity care in hospitals is being reviewed in many areas, and this chapter considers the way in which different patterns of care affect communication between the woman and those caring for her.

It was a marvellous experience. I had the very best treatment for myself, my husband and my baby. Ten out of ten for help and care.

Now, six months after my labour, I still feel angry and distressed when I think about it. I have been left with an overwhelming sense of failure.

(Parents magazine survey 1983)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ball J 1989 Postnatal care and adjustment to motherhood. In Robinson S, Thomson A (eds) Midwives, research and childbirth. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta H D, Thecker S B 1979 Costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring: a review of the literature. US Department of Health Education and Welfare, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright A 1979 The dignity of labour: 114. Tavistock Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Drayton S M, Rees C 1989 Is anyone out there still giving enemas? In Robinson S, Thomson A (eds) Midwives, research and childbirth. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint C, Poulgeneris P 1987 The ‘Know your midwife’ report. Privately printed; available from 49 Peckarmans Wood, Sydenham Hill, London SE26 6RZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Garforth S, Garcia J 1987 Admitting a weakness or a strength? Midwifery 3: 10–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R A, Siddal R S 1922 Is the usual method of preparing patients for delivery beneficial or necessary? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 25: 509–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirke P N 1980 Mothers’ views of obstetric care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 87: 1029–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham M 1983 Admission in labour: teaching the patient to be patient. Midwives Chronicle 96 (2): 44–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham M 1989 Midwives and information giving in labour. In Robinson S, Thomson A (eds) Midwives, research and childbirth. Chapman Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maternity Services Advisory Committee 1982 Maternity care in action, Part I. Antenatal care. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh J 1988 Womens’ views of communication in labour and delivery. Midwifery 4: 166–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahan C S, McKay S 1983 Preps and enemas: keep or discard? Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22 (5): 173–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles M F 1972 Textbook for Midwives, 7th ed.: 278. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley A 1979 Becoming a mother. Martin Robertson, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley A 1980 Women confined: towards a sociology of childbirth. Martin Robertson, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Parents magazine survey 1983 Birth in Britain. Parents 92: 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Parents magazine survey 1986 Birth. Parents 128: 29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney M L 1980 Predelivery shaving: an unjustified assault? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1: 33–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romney M L Gordon H 1981 Is your enema really necessary? British Medical Journal 282: 1269–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Romney M L 1982 Nursing research in obstetrics and gynaecology. International Journal of Nursing Studies 19 (4): 193–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley N Mack E 1980 Are enemas justified for women in labour? American Journal of Nursing July: 1339

    Google Scholar 

Suggested further reading

  • Drayton S M, Rees C 1989 Is anyone out there still giving enemas? In Robinson S, Thomson A (eds) Midwives, research and childbirth. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garforth S, Garcia J 1987 Admitting a weakness or a strength? Midwifery 3: 10–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham M, 1989 Midwives and information giving in labour. In Robinson S, Thomson A (eds) Midwives, research and childbirth. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Sheila Drayton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drayton, S. (1990). Midwifery care in the first stage of labour. In: Alexander, J., Levy, V., Roch, S. (eds) Intrapartum Care. Midwifery Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20981-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20981-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-51370-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20981-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics