Skip to main content

From Gentlemen to Players: Changes in Political Leadership

  • Chapter
Politics and Personalities

Abstract

Only a generation ago Britain’s political institutions were the object of widespread admiration. Churchill’s wartime leadership, the successful mobilisation of people and resources against Hitler, and the Attlee government’s achievements in social welfare and economic reconstruction all provided evidence of the ability of the institutions and leaders to cope with problems and maintain consent.

It is a very difficult country to move, Mr Hyndman, a very difficult country indeed, and one in which there is more disappointment to be looked for than success. Disraeli (1881)

Britain, Progress and Decline (Macmillan, 1980).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The distinction is often applied to France and the United States. For Britain, see Dennis Kavanagh, Crisis, Charisma and British Political Leadership (London: Sage, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. David Apter, The Politics of Modernization (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. L. Guttsman, The British Political Elite (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Rose, ‘Class and Party Divisions: Britain as a Test Case’, Sociology, II (1968) 129–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. D. Muller, The Kept Men? (London: Harvester Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. On this trend, see Michael Young, The Rise of the Meritocracy (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See R. Rose, Politics in England Today (London: Faber, 1974), p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. W. Johnson, ‘The British Political Elite, 1955–1972’, European Journal of Sociology, XIV (1973) 35–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egon Wertheimer, Portrait of the Labour Party (London: Putnam, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quoted in C. L. Mowat, Britain Between the Wars (London: Methuen, 1955), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quoted in Eric Nordlinger, The Working Class Tories (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1967) p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reginald Bevins, The Greasy Pole (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1965);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sir Charles Hill, Both Sides of the Hill (London: Heinemann, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nigel Fisher, The Tory Leaders (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. On the decline of landed estates among Conservative MPs, see Andrew Roth, The Business Backgrounds of MPs (London: Parliamentary Profiles, 1972), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. T. McKenzie and A. Silver, Angels in Marble (London: Heinemann, 1968), p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Bagehot, The English Constitution (London: World’s Classics, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Allen & Unwin, 1943), p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Butler and M. Pinto-Duschinsky, ‘The Conservative Elite 1918–78: Does Unrepresentativeness Matter?’, in Zig Layton-Henry, Conservative Party Politics (London: Macmillan, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lord Hailsham, The Case for Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1959), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Semmel, Imperialism and Social Reform: Social and Imperialist Thought 1895–1914 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. R. Searle, The Quest for National Efficiency (London: Blackwell, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sidney Low, The Governance of England (London: Ernest Benn, 1914), pp. 197 and 304.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anthony Sampson, Anatomy of Britain Today (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1965), pp. 172–3.

    Google Scholar 

  25. John Goldthorpe, ‘Theories of Industrial Society’, European Journal of Sociology, 12, 1971, p. 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. H. S. Crossman, The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, Vol. I (London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape, 1976), p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anthony King, ‘The Election that Everyone Lost’, in Howard Penniman (ed.), Britain at the Polls (Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1974), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See D. Butler and D. Kavanagh, The British General Election of October 1974 (London: Macmillan, 1975), pp. 256–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Anthony King, ‘Overload: Problems of Governing in the 1970s’, Political Studies, XXXIII, 1975, pp. 483–505.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. S. Amery, Thoughts on the Constitution (London: Oxford University Press, 1947), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  31. On this feature, see Robert Putnam, The Beliefs of Politicians (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  32. And Hugh Heclo and Aaron Wildavsky, The Private Government of Public Money (London: Macmillan, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ian Gilmour, The Body Politic (London: Hutchinson, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Dennis Kavanagh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kavanagh, D. (1990). From Gentlemen to Players: Changes in Political Leadership. In: Politics and Personalities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20961-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics