Advertisement

Strategic Setting

  • Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema

Abstract

The defence of a country primarily implies the preservation of its territorial integrity and, through military preparedness, inculcating a sense of security among its citizens. While setting out to formulate a country’s defence policy, the planners often begin with the identification of threats emanating from both external and internal sources. Later they move on to the evaluation of the manner and the intensity of the perceived threats. Comprehensive dossiers on actual and potential adversaries are prepared highlighting the potential enemy’s capabilities and intentions. Justifications for a certain level of force posture are frequently found in the perceived adversaries’ intentions and the country’s defence requirements as assessed by the planners.

Keywords

Security Council Partition Plan Cash Balance Muslim Majority North West Frontier Province 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See K.M. Panikkar, Problems of Indian Defence (New York: Asia Publishing House, 1960), p. 23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid. See also Shelton Kodikara, Strategic Factors in Interstate Relations in South Asia Canberra Papers on Strategy and Defence No. 19 (Canberra: The Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, The Australian National University, 1979), p. 13.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Panikkar, op. cit., p. 26. For a detailed study of sea power’s significance, see Alfred Thayer Marian, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History 1660–1783 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1957), pp. 371–416.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    For details see Lorne J. Kavic India’s Quest for Security: Defence Policies 1947–1965 (Berkely and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967),Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    See Panikkar, op. cit., p. 23; also see Louis Dupree, Afghanistan (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978), p. 363.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Leo E Rose, Nepal: Strategy for Survival (Berkely: University of California Press, 1971), p. 163.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    For an interesting analysis of close border policy which is attributed to Lord Lawrence see Olaf Caroe, The Pathans 550 B. C. -A.D. 1957 (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1976), pp. 346–59.Google Scholar
  8. For forward policy see Richard Issaq Bruce, The Forward Policy and its Results (Quetta: Gosha-e-Adab, 1977).Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    See Roger Beaumont, Sword of the Raj (New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1977), pp. 140–2.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    See the translation of Prince Gorchakov’s Memorandum in W.K. Fraser-Tytler, Afghanistan: A Study of Political Development in Central and Southern Asia, (London: Oxford University Press, 1958), Appendix II, 319–23.Google Scholar
  11. For Lord Roberts see his autobiography entitled Forty one years in India by Field Marshal Lord Roberts of Kandahar (London: Richard Bentley and Son, 1898), pp. vii–x.Google Scholar
  12. 27.
    The war office actually worked out a plan to counter perceived Russian attack on Afghanistan. Ibid., pp. 13–15. Also see B. Prashad, Defence of India: Policy and Plans (London: Orient Longmans, 1963), pp. 22–54.Google Scholar
  13. 33.
    See ‘Armies of the East India Company’ by Sir Wolesley Haig in The Cambridge History of India, Vol. 6, edited by H.H. Dodwell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932), pp. 153–66.Google Scholar
  14. Dumas, the predecessor of Dupleix was the first French official who employed Sepoys. Also see Stringer Lawrence: The Father of the Indian Army by Colonel J. Biddulph (London: John Murray, 1901), p. 13,Google Scholar
  15. ‘The Indian Army Before and After 1947’ by Major General Sir Dashwood Strettell in ‘The Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society’ Vol. 35, 1948, p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. See also Sword of the Raj by Roger Beaumont (New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc. 1977), p. 1.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    For example Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan were two good military commanders. See Philip Mason A Matter of Honour (Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books, 1974), pp. 18–19, 67–8.Google Scholar
  18. 46.
    See The Cambridge Shorter History of India by J. Allan, T.W. Haig and H.H. Dodwell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934), pp. 728–57. Also see ‘The Mutiny’ by T. Rice Holmes in The Cambridge History of India, Vol. 6, op. cit., pp. 167–205.Google Scholar
  19. 59.
    See V. Longer, Red Coats to Olive Green: A History of The Indian Army 1600–1974 (Bombay: Allied Publisher, 1974), p. 135.Google Scholar
  20. 78.
    See Matlubul Hasan Saiyid Mohammad Ali Jinnah (A Political Study), (Lahore: Saikh Muhammad Ashraf, 1945), pp. 135–6, 194–200, 352–3.Google Scholar
  21. Also Selected Speeches and Statements of Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah (1911–34 and 1947–48), edited by Rafique Afzal (Lahore: Research Society of Pakistan, 1976), pp. 122–8.Google Scholar
  22. 83.
    See P. Hardy, the Muslims of British India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 136.
    M.A.K. Azad, India Wins Freedom (Calcutta: Orient Longman, Green, 1960), p. 242.Google Scholar
  24. 139.
    Russell Brines, The Indo Pakistani Conflict (London: Pall Mall Press, 1968), pp. 54–5.Google Scholar
  25. 140.
    G.W. Choudhury, Pakistan’s Relations with India 1947–66 (London: Pall Mall Press, 1968), pp. 4–42.Google Scholar
  26. 146.
    AH, op. cit., p. 204; Choudhury, op. cit., p. 53. Also see Alan Campbell Johnson, Mission with Mountbatten (London: Robert Hale, 1953), p. 124.Google Scholar
  27. 149.
    Richard Symonds, The Making of Pakistan (London: Faber, 1949), p. 85. Also see Ali, op. cit., pp. 204–5. Keesings Contemporary Archives, op. cit., June 28-July 5, 1947, p. 8696.Google Scholar
  28. 150.
    Muhammad Zafrullah Khan, Servant of God (Surrey: Unwin Brothers, 1983), pp. 137–41.Google Scholar
  29. 158.
    Lord Ismay, Memoirs (London: Heinemann, 1960), p. 42. Also see Ali, op. cit., p. 208.Google Scholar
  30. 159.
    Ian Stephens, Pakistan (London: Ernest Benn, 1963), p. 180. Also quoted in Ali, op. cit., p. 208.Google Scholar
  31. 162.
    Donald N. Wilber, Pakistan: Yesterday and Today (New York: Hold Rinehart and Winston Inc., 1964), p. 216.Google Scholar
  32. 164.
    L.F. Rushbrook Williams, The State of Pakistan (London: Faber and Faber 1962), p. 48.Google Scholar
  33. 167.
    Lord Birdwood, A Continent Decides (London: Robert Hale, 1953), pp. 235–6 and Two Nations and Kashmir (London: Robert Hale, 1956), p. 74.Google Scholar
  34. 177.
    Mohammad Ali Jinnah: Speeches As Governor-General (Karachi: Pakistan Publications, 1963), pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
  35. 181.
    J.B. Das-Gupta, Indo-Pakistani Relations 1947–1955 (Amsterdam: Djambatan, 1960), p. 190.Google Scholar
  36. 185.
    Sir Percival Griffith, Modern India (London/New York: Benn/Praeger 1965), p. 103.Google Scholar
  37. 195.
    D.G. Tendulkar, Mahatma (8 volumes, New Delhi: Government of India, 1960–3), Vol. 8, p. 252.Google Scholar
  38. 200.
    Kewal L. Panjabi, The Indomitable Sardar (Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1962), p. 139. Also see Burke, op. cit., pp. 13—14.Google Scholar
  39. 204.
    John Connell, Auchinleck (London: Cassell, 1959), p. 916.Google Scholar
  40. 225.
    For details see A.A. Michel, The Indus Rivers (Princeton, N.J: Yale University Press, 1967), p. 559.Google Scholar
  41. 235.
    Lord Mountbatten, time Only to Look Forward (London: Nicholas Kaye, 1949), p. 42.Google Scholar
  42. 263.
    Sisir Gupta, Kashmir (London: Asia Publishing House, 1966), p. 95.Google Scholar
  43. 271.
    Prem Nath Bazaz, The History of Struggle for Freedom in Kashmir (New Dehli: Kashmir Publishing Co. 1954), p. 138.Google Scholar
  44. 279.
    See Josef Korbel ‘New Hopes for Kashmir’, in Foreign Policy Bulletin, Vol. 34, 1 March 1955, p. 89.Google Scholar
  45. 282.
    See Jawaharlal Nehru, Independence and After: A Collection of Speeches 1946–49 (New York: The John Day Company, 1950), pp. 60–3.Google Scholar
  46. 283.
    K. Sarwar Hasan (ed.), Documents on the Foreign Relations of Pakistan, The Kashmir Question (Karachi: Pakistan Institute of International Affairs, 1966), p. 68.Google Scholar
  47. 306.
    Josef Korbel, Danger in Kashmir (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar
  48. 331.
    For details of exact physical locations and the nature of topographical terrain see Dr Kazi S. Ahmad, A Geography of Pakistan (Karachi/Lahore: Oxford University Press, 1964), pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
  49. 332.
    The terms ‘borders’ and ‘boundary’ are synonymously used here. See J.R.V. Prescott Political Geography (London: Methuen and Co. Ltd., 1972), p. 55.Google Scholar
  50. 333.
    For details see Norman J.G. Pounds Political Geography (New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc., 1963), pp. 56–7. Also see Prescott, op. cit., pp. 54–5.Google Scholar
  51. 334.
    See Mujtaba Razvi, The Frontiers of Pakistan (Karachi: National Publishing House Ltd., 1971), pp. 4–7. Also see Prescott, op. cit., p. 63 and Pounds, op. cit., pp. 65–6.Google Scholar
  52. 359.
    See D.P. Singhal India and Afghanistan 1876–1907: A Study in Diplomatic Relations (St Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press, 1963), pp. 151–4.Google Scholar
  53. 360.
    See ‘Political Problems of a Borderland’ by James W. Sapin in Pakistan’s Western Borderlands, ed. by Ainslie T. Embree (Karachi: Royal Book, 1979), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  54. 361.
    See Sir William Barton, India’s North-West Frontier (London: John Murray, 1939), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  55. 362.
    See Alastair Lamb: Asian Frontier: Studies in Continuing Problem (New York: Frederick A. Praeer, 1968), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar
  56. 363.
    Broadly speaking the British policy towards the North West Frontier can be classified into two categories: close border policy and forward policy. From the time of the British annexation of Punjab up to the outbreak of the second Afghan War is often termed as a period in which close border policy was practised. The supporters of close border schools were advocating that the British should avoid taking on the responsibility of direct administrative control and defence of the territory beyond Indus. Compared to the close border school, the exponents of forward policy were promoting an aggressive policy bringing all the frontier tribes under one authority and pushing the border up to the Hindukush range. The period between the second Afghan War to the creation of the North West Frontier Province is generally regarded as a forward policy period. Three reasons account for the success of the forward policy: 1) Russian advances in Central Asia; 2) in each decade the supporters of close border were few and much less influential than those advocating forward policy; 3) lack of strong central authority among the tribesmen. For details of various schools and especially the forward policy school see Richard Issaq Bruce, The Forward Policy and its Result (Quetta: Gosha-e-Adad, 1977), a reprint.Google Scholar
  57. The book was originally published by Longmans, Green and Co. in London in 1900. Also see Philip Woodruff, The Men Who Ruled India: The Guardians (London: Jonathan Cape, 1954), pp. 138–54.Google Scholar
  58. Also see A.B. Awan, Baluchistan: Historical and Political Processes (London: New Century Publishers, 1985), pp. 145–56.Google Scholar
  59. Also see ‘Historical Setting’ by Surjet Mansingh in Pakistan: A Country Study, edited by Richard F. Nyrop (Washington: US Government, 1984), p. 20; Caroe, op. cit., pp. 346–59, 370–412; Barton, op. cit., pp. 1–7, 56–82; Lamb, op. cit., pp. 79–93; Singhal, pp. 178–9.Google Scholar
  60. 371.
    Alan Campbell-Johnson called this situation a ‘bastard situation’. What he really meant was that the Congress Ministry was still in power in a Province where more than 90 per cent of the population was Muslim and the majority of the people, by 1947, had gone over to the Muslim League. See Alan Campbell-Johnson, Mission with Mountbatten (London: Robert Hale, 1951), pp. 54 and 74. Also see Burke, op. cit., p. 69.Google Scholar
  61. 380.
    Ibid. Also see H.V. Hodson, The Great Divide (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 282–6.Google Scholar
  62. 388.
    See the ‘Frontier Policy of Pakistan’ in Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Speeches As Governor General of Pakistan 1947–48 (Karachi: Government of Pakistan, 1963), pp. 132–3.391. Quoted in ‘Pakistan’s Imperial Legacy’ by Ainslie T. Embree in Pakistan’s Western Borderlands, op. cit., pp. 25–7.Google Scholar
  63. 401.
    See Hugh Tinker, The Union of Burma (London: Oxford University Press, 1959), p. 357 406. See ‘Pakistan’s Relations with the Major Powers and some Minor Agreement’ by W.M. Dobell in Pacific Affairs, Winter 1964–65, pp. 389–90. Also see The Statesman, 27 April 1947. Also quoted in Razvi, op. cit., pp. 198–9.Google Scholar
  64. 414.
    See ‘Pakistan and China: The Scope and Limits of Convergent Policies’ by Khalid B. Sayeed in A.M. Halpern (ed.), Policies Towards China: Views from Six Continents (New York: McGraw Hill, 1965), p. 234.Google Scholar
  65. 415.
    See G.W. Choudhury, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and the Major Powers (New York: The Free Press, 1975), p. 160.Google Scholar
  66. 420.
    For details see H.C. Hinton, Communist China in World Politics (Washington: The George Washington Institute for the Defence Analysis, 1965), p. 317. Also see Razvi, op. cit., pp. 168–9.Google Scholar
  67. 440.
    See ‘The Sino-Pakistan Border: Historical Aspect’ by Zabeida Mustafa in Pakistan Horizon, Vol. XXV, No. 2, second quarter 1972, pp. 43–50.Google Scholar
  68. 430.
    See ‘The Asian Frontiers of Kashmir’ by Lord Birdwood in Royal Central Asian Journal, July-October 1952, Vol. XXXIX, pp. 241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Also see Lord Birdwood Two Nations and Kashmir (London: Robert Hale, 1956), p. 120.Google Scholar
  70. 449.
    Justice Din Muhammad went to see Jinnah in order to secure his consent to resign from the Boundary Commission. He informed Jinnah that Radcliffe had already settled in his mind the line of demarcation of the boundary which was seriously prejudicial to Muslim interests. But Jinnah refused to give the desired permission. See Zafrullah Khan op. cit., p. 140. Jinnah referred to the award as unjust, incomprehensible and even perverse but asserted that as honourable people it had to be accepted because of the prior commitment to the Boundary Commission. See Mohammad Ali Jinnah Speeches As Governor General of Pakistan 1947–48, op. cit., 1963, p. 12. See also Choudhury, op. cit., p. 57.Google Scholar
  71. 455.
    See Ian Stephens, Horned Moon (London: Chatto and Windus, 1953), p. 33. Also see Dawn, 18 March 1950.Google Scholar
  72. 464.
    By skilful moves Sandeman was able to extend British influence over the entire Baluchistan. His system rested on the occupation of central points in Kalat and tribal territory in considerable force, linking them together by the fair-weather roads, and leaving the tribes to manage their own affairs according to their customs and working through their Chiefs and Maliks. In many ways the system was described as one of indirect rule. See Caroe, op. cit., p. 376. Also see Thomas Henry Thornton, Sir Robert Sandeman: His Life and Work (London: John Murray 1895), p. 94. Sandeman’s achievements were greatly appreciated by his British colleagues like Sir Mortimer Durand. See Durand’s letter to Lord Roberts, quoted in Sykes, op. cit., p. 171. Also see Thornton’s work on Sandeman.Google Scholar
  73. 469.
    Ibid. Also see Mir Ahmad Yar Khan Baluch, Inside Baluchistan (Karachi: Royal Book Company, 1975), pp. 255–96.Google Scholar
  74. Also see Selig S. Harrison, In Afghanistan’s Shadow: Baluch Nationalism and Soviet Temptations (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1981), pp. 22–6. Also see Awan, op. cit., p. 211.Google Scholar
  75. 480.
    See Percy W. Bidwell’s article on ‘Ideals in American Foreign Policy’ in International Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 4, October 1946, pp. 479–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 481.
    Originally the phrase was used by Sir Anthony Eden in House of Commons debates in 1944 when he actually referred to Anglo-Russian relations. Quoted in ‘The Outlook in the USSR’ by Alexander Werth in International Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 1, January 1946, pp. 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 482.
    See ‘The International Outlook’ by Arnold J. Toynbee in International Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 4, October 1947, pp. 463–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 486.
    See ‘The Foreign Policy of the United States’ by M.J. Bonn in The Yearbook of World Affairs 1948, published by the London Institute of World Affairs (London: Stevens and Sons Limited, 1948), p. 43. For details of the European Recovery Programme see statements of George C. Marshall in Department of State Bulletin, Vol. 18, 1948, pp. 71–7, 108–14, 231–2, 374–5. Also see statements of Ernest A. Gross (Legal Adviser) on pages 564–7, 585. Also see Charles E. Bohlen (Counsellor) Statement, pp. 78–82.Google Scholar
  79. 490.
    See Marshall D. Shulman, Beyond the Cold War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  80. 491.
    See Thomas G. Paterson, J. Gassy Clifford and Kenneth J. Hagen, American Foreign Policy (Lexington: DC Heath and Company, 1977), pp. 446–7.Google Scholar
  81. 496.
    Harry S. Truman Memoirs, Vol. 1, Year of Decisions (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday and Company Inc. 1955), p. 416.Google Scholar
  82. 498.
    Two famous speeches are often interpreted as the announcements of the Cold War. These are Stalin’s speech on Capitalism and Communism in the Postwar World on 9 February 1946 and Sir Winston Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech on 13 March 1946. In addition George Kennan’s long telegram in which he interpreted the motivations of Soviet policies also needs to be read with the above mentioned speeches. For details of speeches and Kennan’s telegram see The Dynamics of World Power: A Documentary History of United States Foreign Policy 1945–1973, Vol. II, edited by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. (New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1973), pp. 191–221.Google Scholar
  83. 500.
    See Charles Robertson, International Politics Since World War II: A Short History (New York: and London: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1975), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema
    • 1
  1. 1.Quaid-i-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations