Skip to main content

The Status of the Foetus

  • Chapter
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

Arguments concerning the status of the foetus are not simply modern ones arising out of the increasing ability of medical science to manipulate the components of future and existing people. They have also arisen from the age-old problem of pregnancies that are for one reason or another undesirable. Consequently there exists a considerable body of opinion in society giving rise to much argument when moral dilemmas arise. These arguments are rooted in the problems of defining what is a human being, whether or not there is a moral distinction between a human being and a human person and also in questions of human rights. The results of such unresolved argument are evident in the inconsistent and ambiguous attitudes of society towards the foetus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Glover, Causing Death and Saving Lives ( Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1977 ) p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Campbell, Moral Dilemmas in Medicine (Churchill Livingstone, 1972 ) p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Singer, Practical Ethics ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979 ) p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Tooley, ‘Abortion and Infanticide’ (Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1972 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. L. Beauchamp and J. F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983 ) p. 512.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. D. Hudson, Modern Moral Philosophy ( London: Macmillan, 1970 ) p. 321

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Warnock, A Question of Life ( Oxford: Blackwell, 1985 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilchrist, N. (1990). The Status of the Foetus. In: Evans, D. (eds) Why Should We Care?. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20888-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics