Abstract
Arguments concerning the status of the foetus are not simply modern ones arising out of the increasing ability of medical science to manipulate the components of future and existing people. They have also arisen from the age-old problem of pregnancies that are for one reason or another undesirable. Consequently there exists a considerable body of opinion in society giving rise to much argument when moral dilemmas arise. These arguments are rooted in the problems of defining what is a human being, whether or not there is a moral distinction between a human being and a human person and also in questions of human rights. The results of such unresolved argument are evident in the inconsistent and ambiguous attitudes of society towards the foetus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Glover, Causing Death and Saving Lives ( Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1977 ) p. 121.
A. V. Campbell, Moral Dilemmas in Medicine (Churchill Livingstone, 1972 ) p. 124.
P. Singer, Practical Ethics ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979 ) p. 109.
M. Tooley, ‘Abortion and Infanticide’ (Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1972 ).
T. L. Beauchamp and J. F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983 ) p. 512.
W. D. Hudson, Modern Moral Philosophy ( London: Macmillan, 1970 ) p. 321
M. Warnock, A Question of Life ( Oxford: Blackwell, 1985 ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilchrist, N. (1990). The Status of the Foetus. In: Evans, D. (eds) Why Should We Care?. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20888-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20888-3_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-51563-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20888-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)