Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

Abstract

The general idea underlying socialist planning is that the market economy is a good system for ensuring micro-economic rationality (e.g. the efficient organisation of production within individual factories) but that it fails to ensure macro-economic and macro-social rationality (e.g. unemployment, poverty, inequality, pollution, wars). Hence to ensure national economic rationality requires using the state as an instrument to manage the national economy in a way analogous to that in which individual firms manage their factories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

The traditional Soviet-type model

  • Brus, W. 1972. The Market in a Socialist Economy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellman, M. 1978. The fundamental problem of socialist planning. Oxford Economic Papers, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. 1963. Notes for a theory of the command economy. Soviet Studies XV(2), 101–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1959. Overcentralization in Economic Administration. Trans. John Knapp. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisichkin, G. 1988. Mify i real ‘nost’. Novyi Mir, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleski, E. 1980. Stalinist Planning for Economic Growth, 1933–1952. Chapel Hill N.C.

    Google Scholar 

The indirectly bureaucratically controlled model

  • Abalkin, L. 1989. Kakim byt’ novomu pyatletnomu planu? Kommunist no. 6 (English translation likely in Problems of Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, L. 1989. Some lessons from two decades of economic reform in Hungary. Communist Economies 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feher, F. 1982. Paternalism as a mode of legitimation in Soviet-type societies. In Political Legitimation in Communist States, ed. T.H. Rigby and F. Fehér, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.B. 1986. Plan bargaining in the Hungarian economy: an interview with Dr. Laszlo Antal. Comparative Economic Studies XXVIII (2), summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1986. The Hungarian reform process. Journal of Economic Literature XXIV(4), December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1988. Individual freedom and reform of the socialist economy. European Economic Review 32(2/3), March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laky, T. 1980. The hidden mechanism of recentralization in Hungary. Acta Oeconomica 24(1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Novozhilov, V.V. 1970. Problems of Cost-benefit Analysis in Optimal Planning (translated from Russian). White Plains, New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaan, W. 1990. Price regulation in Hungary: Indirect but comprehensive bureaucratic control. Comparative Economic Studies 1.

    Google Scholar 

The Tinbergenian model

  • Het Plan van de Arbeid (Labour’s plan). 1935. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driehuis, W., Fase, M.M.G. and den Hartog, D. (eds.) 1988. Challenges for Macroeconomic Modelling. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. and Holmes, P. 1983. French Planning in Theory and Practice. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R.T. 1980. The Netherlands Central Planning Bureau, in Griffiths, R.T. (ed.) The Economy and Politics of the Netherlands since 1945. The Hague.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • den Hartog, H. and Tjan, H.S. 1976. Investments, wages, prices and demand for labour. De Economist 124(1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes Hallett, A.J. 1989. Econometrics and the theory of economic policy: The Tinbergen-Theil contributions 40 years on. Oxford Economic Papers 41(1), January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick, T. 1976. The possibilities of development planning. Oxford Economic Papers 28(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoester, A. 1983. Stagnation and the inverted Haavelmo effect: some international evidence. De Economist 131(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Komiya, R. 1975. Planning in Japan, in M. Bornstein (ed.), Economic Planning: West and East. Cambridge, Mass. Reprinted in M. Bornstein (ed.), Comparative Economic Systems: Models and Cases, 4th ed. Homewood, Illinois, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian issue. 1968. Economics of Planning 8(1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. 1952. On the Theory of Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 2nd ed., 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. 1956. Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Rev. ed., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. 1964. Central Planning. New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. 1967. Development Planning. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellman, M. (1990). Socialist Planning. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Problems of the Planned Economy. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20863-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20863-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49549-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20863-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics