Abstract
Neoclassical capital theory regards the interest rate as the market price of the composite factor ‘capital’. In this theory the interest rate is equal to the marginal product of the capital, since the demand curve for capital is its marginal productivity schedule. Moreover, the theory assumes that capital obeys the law of diminishing returns just like any other factor, so that its demand curve is downward-sloping. In an economy where labour is the only primary factor and constant returns to scale prevail, this implies the following postulate: as the interest rate falls, the capital-labour ratio increases, which plays an important role in neoclassical growth theory and in comparative static analyses of interest rate determination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Blaug, M. 1974. The Cambridge Revolution: Success or Failure? London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
Bruno, M., Burmeister, E. and Sheshinski, E. 1966. The nature and implications of the reswitching of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(4), November, 526–53.
Burmeister, E. 1980. Capital Theory and Dynamics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burmeister, E. and Dobell, R. 1970. Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth. New York: Macmillan Co.
Champernowne, D.G. 1953–4. The production function and the theory of capital: a comment. Review of Economic Studies 21, 112–35.
Harcourt, G.C. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hatta, T. 1976. The paradox in capital theory and complementarity of inputs. Review of Economic Studies 43, 127–42.
Hicks, J. 1946. Value and Capital. 2nd edn, London: Oxford University Press.
Pasinetti, L.L. et al. 1966. Paradoxes in capital theory: a symposium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(4), November, 503–83.
Robinson, J. 1953–4. The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies 21, 81–106.
Robinson, J. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan; Homewood, Ill.: R.D. Irwin.
Samuelson, P.A. 1966. A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 568–83.
Solow, R. 1975. Brief comments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89, 48–52.
Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Weizsäcker, C.C. 1971. Steady State Capital Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hatta, T. (1990). Capital perversity. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Capital Theory. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20861-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20861-6_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49547-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20861-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)