Skip to main content

Postmodernism and Language

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Communications and Culture ((COMMCU))

Abstract

If we accept Lyotard’s (1979) argument that the advent of postmodernism is marked by a shift from truth to fiction and narrative, by a change from the world of experience to that of language, and by the demise of the three great metanarratives of science, religion and politics with their replacement by local language-games, then the science of linguistics finds itself in an irreducible quandary, yet in a privileged position. As a science it must submit to the general fate of metanarratives, and at least change its concept of truth. On the other hand, however, it is the science whose subject matter is at the centre of the postmodern critique. It might hope therefore to survive relatively unscathed, with the result that there still could be something like a postmodern linguistics. It is my intention to explore this profoundly ambiguous situation, even though it might be said of me as a linguist, that I am attempting to have my cake and eat it too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • BARTHES, R. (1978), Leçon, Paris, Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALVET, L. J. (1974), Linguistique et colonialisme, Paris, Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHOMSKY, N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELEUZE, G. and GUATTARI, F. (1980), Milles plateaux, Paris, Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELEUZE, G. and GUATTARI, F. (1975), Kafka, Paris, Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMESON, F. (1981), The Political Unconscious, Cornell, Cornell UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • LACLAU, E. and MOUFFE, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London, Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • LECERCLE, J.-J., (1985), Philosophy Through the Looking-Glass, London, Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • LECERCLE, J.-J., (1988), ‘Répétition et vérité dans Caleb Williams’, Tropismes, No. 5, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • LECERCLE, J.-J., (1988), ‘The misprision of pragmatics’ in A. Phillips Griffiths (ed.), Contemporary French Philosophy, Cambridge, CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • LENIN, V. I., (1917), On Slogans.

    Google Scholar 

  • LYOTARD, J. F. (1979), La condition postmoderne, Paris, Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • LYOTARD, J. F. (1983), Le différend, Paris, Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, J. A. (1977), ‘Suture, elements of the logic of the signifier’, Screen, Vol. 18, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILNER, J.-C. (1978), L’Amour de la langue, Paris, Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILNER, J.-C. (1983), Les noms indistincts, Paris, Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUWET, N. (1975), ‘Parallelismes et déviations en poésie’ in J. Kristeva, J.-C. Milner and N. Ruwet (eds), Langue, Discours, Société, Paris, Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, E. P. (1968), The Making of the English Working Class, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • TODOROV, T. (1970), ‘Freud sur l’énonciation’, Langages, No. 17, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Roy Boyne Ali Rattansi

Copyright information

© 1990 Jean-Jacques Lecercle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lecercle, JJ. (1990). Postmodernism and Language. In: Boyne, R., Rattansi, A. (eds) Postmodernism and Society. Communications and Culture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20843-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20843-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-47511-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20843-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics