Abstract
The ideal of public participation in political life, along with the concept of popular sovereignty, has gained a powerful hold on the modern political imagination. But ‘participation’ is an elastic yes-word, with different connotations in different political cultures. In liberal democratic regimes the meaning of participation has been given above all by electoral politics. Political power is legitimated by the preferences of individual voters, and political choice in turn implies a domain of civil society in which political parties and pressure groups can carry on an open political struggle. In the Soviet tradition ‘participation’ is understood differently. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union has claimed the right to a monopoly of political power, on the grounds that Soviet society, having rid itself of capitalism and class antagonism, is fundamentally harmonious. The party rules in the interests of the people as a whole; there is therefore no room for political competition and electoral choice, and no place for an autonomous domain of civil society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1990 Nicholas Lampert
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lampert, N. (1990). Patterns of Participation. In: Developments in Soviet Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20819-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20819-7_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-52743-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20819-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)