Advertisement

Social Science Interpretations of Nationalism and of Nation Formation in the ‘Third World’

  • Bassam Tibi

Abstract

Kohn has come to the conclusion after years of research that while nationalism at the time of the French Revolution was an expression of aspirations towards individual liberty and democracy, it has developed in advanced bourgeois society into a notion which not only seeks to restrict liberty but even claims superiority over it. ‘It is different in “underdeveloped” countries, where nationalism still contains elements of human progress, as it once did in the West.’2 This thesis is accepted by numerous social scientists and historians. Emerson, an expert on national movements in colonial countries, agrees that ‘in the large, nationalism in Asia and Africa, as at least in its initial phases in Europe and America, is a forward looking and not a reactionary force, a spur to revolution and not a bulwark of the status quo’.3 As the present discussion will show, this thesis needs modification to the extent that while nationalism in the ‘Third World’ does indeed express the desire of oppressed people for emancipation, it cannot of itself bring about emancipation. Furthermore, nationalism in colonial and semi-colonial countries is not sui generis connected with the process of nation formation, since nationalism is not always based on a clearly defined notion of nationality.

Keywords

National State Nation Formation Underdeveloped Country National Consciousness National Question 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Rupert Emerson, From Empire to Nation: The Rise of Self-Assert ion of Asian and African Peoples, 3rd ed. (Boston, 1964) p. 206.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Fetscher documents the points discussed in this section in Der Marxismus und seine Geschichte in Dokumenten, vol. III, Politik (Munich, 1965), especially the chapter ‘Die Nation’, pp. 91–121.Google Scholar
  3. Horace B. Davis, Nationalism and Socialism. Marxist and Labor Theories of Nationalism to 1917 (New York and London, 1967),Google Scholar
  4. and a review of this by B. Tibi, ‘Marxismus and Nationalismusanalyse’, Neue Politische Literatur, XIV (1969) 560–1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karl Kautsky in ‘Nationalität und Internationalität’, Supplementary Number of Neue Zeit, No. 1, 18 January 1908, pp. 17 ff., 23 ff.,Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karl Marx, Letter to Engels, 5 July 1870, in Marx-Engels-Werke, vol. xxxii (Berlin, 1965) p. 520.Google Scholar
  7. Marx’ position on the Polish Question can be surmised from his Manuskripte über die polnische Frage (1863–1864), ed. W. Conze (‘sGravenhage, 1961).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Karl Marx, ‘Rede über Polen’, in Marx-Engels- Werke, 3rd ed., vol. IV (Berlin, 1964) pp. 416 f.;Google Scholar
  9. Eng. transl., ‘On Poland’, in Collected Works, vol. vi (London, 1976) pp. 388–9.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Karl Marx, ‘Rede über die Frage des Freihandels’, in Marx-Engels-Werke, 3rd ed., vol. IV (Berlin, 1964) pp. 444–58;Google Scholar
  11. Eng. transl., ‘Speech on the Question of Free Trade’, in Collected Works, vol. VI (London, 1976) pp. 450–65; here p. 464.Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Karl Marx, Letter to Engels, 20 June 1866, in Marx-Engels- Werke, vol. xxxi (Berlin, 1965) pp. 228 f.;Google Scholar
  13. Eng. transl., in Dona Torr (ed. and transl.), The Correspondence of Marx and Engels, 1846–1895 (London, 1934) p. 207.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    see Friedrich Engels, ‘Das Fest der Nationen in London’, in Marx-Engels-Werke, vol. II (Berlin, 1962) pp. 611–24;Google Scholar
  15. Eng. transl. ‘The Festival of Nations in London’, in Collected Works, vol. VI (London, 1976) pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  16. see here J. Moneta, Die Kolonialpolitik der französischen KP (Hanover, 1968),Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    See K. Marx, ‘Die englische Regierung und die eingekerkerten Fenier’, in Marx-Engels-Werke, vol. XVI (Berlin, 1962) pp. 401–6;Google Scholar
  18. idem., ‘Entwurf eines Vortrages zur irischen Frage’, ibid., pp. 445–59;Google Scholar
  19. idem., ‘Entwurf einer nicht gehaltenen Rede zur irischen Frage’, ibid., pp. 439–46.Google Scholar
  20. On the Irish question see Lawrence J. McCaffrey, The Irish Question 1800–1922 (Lexington, 1968).Google Scholar
  21. 12.
    K. Marx, Letter to Engels, 10 Dec. 1869, in Marx-Engels-Werke, vol. XXXII (Berlin, 1965) pp. 414 ff.Google Scholar
  22. 13.
    F. Engels, ‘Rede über Polen’, in Marx-Engels-Werke, 3rd ed., vol IV (Berlin, 1964) pp. 417 f.; here p. 417;Google Scholar
  23. Eng. transl., ‘Speech on Poland’, in K. Marx and F. Engels, Collected Works, vol. VI (London, 1976) pp. 389–90; here p. 389.Google Scholar
  24. 14.
    F. Engels, ‘Eine polnische Proklamation’, in Marx-Engels-Werke, 2nd ed., vol. XVIII (Berlin, 1964) pp. 521–7; here p. 527.Google Scholar
  25. 15.
    F. Engels, ‘Was hat die Arbeiterklasse mit Polen zu tun?’, in Marx-Engels-Werke, vol. xvi (Berlin, 1962) pp. 153–63; here p. 157.Google Scholar
  26. 18.
    F. Engels, ‘Po und Rhein’, in Marx-Engels-Werke, 2nd ed., vol. xiii (Berlin, 1964) pp. 225–68; here p. 267.Google Scholar
  27. For a critique of the structuralists’ hostility towards history, and particularly that of Lévi-Strauss, cf. Alfred Schmidt (ed.), Beiträge zur marxistischen Erkenntnistheorie (Frankfurt/Main, 1969) pp. 194–265.Google Scholar
  28. 19.
    O. Bauer, Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie, Marx-Studien, vol. II, ed. M. Adler and R. Hilferding, 2nd ed. (Vienna, 1924) Chapter 17, pp. 215 ff.Google Scholar
  29. see Bauer’s reply, ‘Bemerkungen zur Nationalitätenfrage’, Die Neue Zeit, xxvi, pt. 1, (1907–8).Google Scholar
  30. For a critique of Bauer, see H. O. Ziegler, Die moderne Nation (Tübingen, 1931) pp. 49 ff.;Google Scholar
  31. cf. also Karl W. Deutsch, Nationalism and Social Communication, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, Mass., 1966) pp. 19 f.Google Scholar
  32. 25.
    V. I. Lenin, ‘The Right of Nations to Self-Determination’, (Eng. transl.) in Collected Works, vol. XX (Moscow and London, 1964) pp. 393–454; here p. 397.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    V. I. Lenin, ‘The Socialist Revolution and the Right of Nations to Self-Determination’, (Eng. transl.) in Collected Works, vol. xxii (Moscow and London, 1964) pp. 143–56; here p. 148.Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    Rosa Luxemburg writes: ‘The famous “right of self-determination of nations”, is nothing but hollow petty-bourgeois phraseology and humbug.’ Die russische Revolution, ed. O. Flechtheim (Frankfurt/Main, 1963) p. 60;Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    E. Bernstein, quoted by Karl Kautsky, Sozialismus und Kolonialpolitik (Berlin, 1907) p. 6;Google Scholar
  36. Eng. transl., Socialism and Colonial Policy: An Analysis (Belfast, 1975) p. 3.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    P. E. Sigmund (ed.), The Ideologies of Developing Nations, 2nd ed. (New York, 1967) pp. 36 ff.Google Scholar
  38. See also David Apter, The Politics of Modernization (Chicago, 1965) pp. 330 ff., also pp. 172 ff.Google Scholar
  39. For the source of this popular ideology approach, see Karl Mannheim, Ideologie und Utopie, 4th ed. (Frankfurt/Main, 1965) pp. 49–94;Google Scholar
  40. Eng. transl., Ideology and Utopia, 7th ed. (London, 1954) pp. 49–96, where he develops the ‘total ideological approach’.Google Scholar
  41. Oh the problem of ideology, see Kurt Lenk (ed.), Ideologic, Ideologiekritik und Wissenssoziologie: Problemgeschichtliche Einleitung, 2nd ed. (Berlin, 1964) Ch. 1.Google Scholar
  42. 39.
    See Max F. Millikan and Donald L. M. Blackmer (eds), The Emerging Nations (Boston and Toronto, 1961).Google Scholar
  43. The role of nationalism in the process of the disintegration of traditional societies is also discussed by the modernisation theorist Edward Shils in Political Development in the New States (The Hague, 1965) pp. 32 f.Google Scholar
  44. 40.
    See Mary Matossian, ‘Ideologies of Delayed Industrialisation: Some Tensions and Ambiguities’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, VI (1958) No. 3, 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 41.
    K. H. Silvert, ‘The Strategy of the Study of Nationalism’, in idem (ed.), Expectant Peoples, Nationalism and Development (New York, 1963) pp. 3–38; here p. 26.Google Scholar
  46. 42.
    John H. Kautsky, ‘An Essay in the Politics of Development’, in idem (ed.), Political Change in Underdeveloped Countries, Nationalism and Communism, 7th ed. (New York, 1967) pp. 3–119.Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    W. Sulzbach, Imperialisms und Nationalbewuβtsein (Frankfurt/Main, 1959) pp. 108 f. (On Sulzbach cf. Chapter 1, note 11).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    On this see also C. B. Macpherson, The Real World of Democracy (Oxford, 1966) pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
  49. 50.
    The relationship between the colonial intellectual and nationalism has been investigated by Klaus Mehnert, ‘The Social and Political Role of the Intelligentsia in the New Countries’, in Kurt London (ed.), New Nations in a Divided World (New York, 1963) pp. 121–33.Google Scholar
  50. 51.
    For a critique cf. A. Neusüss, Utopisches Bewuβtsein und freischwebende Intelligenz; Zur Wissenssoziologie Karl Mannheims (Meisenheim am Glan, 1968).Google Scholar
  51. 52.
    Jean Ziegler, Politische Soziologie des neuen Afrika (Munich, 1966) pp. 16 f.,Google Scholar
  52. For a critique of this thesis, see B. Tibi, ‘Zum Verhältnis von Militär und kolonialem Nationalismus am Beispiel der arabischen Länder’, Sozialistische Politik, I (1969) No. 4, 4–19, especially page 9.Google Scholar
  53. See T. B. Bottomore, Elites and Society, 2nd ed. (London, 1966) pp. 93–111, especially p. 96.Google Scholar
  54. 55a.
    see the review by B. Tibi in Das Argument, XII (1970) No. 59, 641–3.Google Scholar
  55. 56.
    Richard F. Behrendt, Soziale Strategic für Entwicklungsländer, Entwurf einer Entwicklungsstragegie (Frankfurt/Main, 1965) p. 250.Google Scholar
  56. 78.
    Frantz Fanon, Les Damnés de la Terre (Paris, 1961);Google Scholar
  57. Eng. transl., The Wretched of the Earth, 2nd ed. (London, 1967).Google Scholar
  58. 90.
    See J. C. de Graft-Johnson, African Glory: The story of Vanished Negro Civilisation, 2nd ed. (New York, 1966),Google Scholar
  59. and the review by B. Tibi in Der Politologe, viii, No. 24 (1967) 44 ff.Google Scholar
  60. 94.
    See L. S. Senghor, Negritude et Humanisme (Paris, 1964) passim.Google Scholar
  61. see B. Tibi, Das Argument, XI (1969) No. 51, 138 ff.Google Scholar
  62. 105.
    See also B. Tibi, ‘Léopold Senghors “Négritude”’, Das Argument, IX (1967) No. 45, 422 ff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Suhrkamp-Verlag, Frankfurt/Main 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bassam Tibi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations