Skip to main content

Sub/contracting and Industrial Development

  • Chapter

Abstract

It is some time since the Department of Employment confirmed that the use of contractors and subcontractors in British industry was increasing (Employment Gazette, October 1985), and recent studies (see, for example, Guardian, 24 September 1986) would appear to suggest that this trend is not confined to the nationalised industries and services where contracting out has been a method of privatisation. Although we now know a great deal about the effect of this trend on the workforce (for recent examples see Guardian, 21 January 1987, Listener, 12 November 1987 and Hurstfield, 1987a, 1987b), the theory of contracting and subcontracting remains underdeveloped. Researchers who have tried to look beyond the social effects of contracting-out enter a realm of some confusion. For example, Ascher (1987) concludes that it is doubtful whether contracting out public services has been more efficient or cheaper (also see Fevre, 1986). This chapter begins with the assumption that some knowledge of the place of contractors and subcontractors in the history of industrial change will help to clear away some of the confusion inherent in contemporary explanations of this form of industrial organisation. But before we consider the historical data, we must first define the form of industrial organisation which interests us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • S. Allen and C. Wolkowitz, Homeworking — Myths and Realities (Basingstoke: MacMillan Education, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Anderson, Women in the Factory (London: John Murray, 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Anderson, Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Ascher, The Politics of Privatisation: Contracting Out the Public Services (London: Macmillan, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. S. Atkins, The Strategic Future of the Wool Textile Industry (London: NEDO/HMSO, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Atkinson, Emerging UK Work Patterns (Brighton: Institute for Manpower Studies, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Bendix, Work and Authority in Industry (London: John Wiley, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Berg (ed.), Technology and Toil in Nineteenth Century Britain (London: CSE Books, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Berg, The Age of Manufactures (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bienefeld, Working Hours in British Industry: An Economic History (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bythell, The Handloom Weavers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D. Bythell, The Sweated Trades: Outwork in Nineteenth Century Britain (London: Batsford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. H. Clapham, The Woollen and Worsted Industries (London: Methuen, 1907).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. R. D. C. Corrigan, ‘Feudal relics or capitalist monuments?’ Sociology, Vol. 11, 1977, pp. 435–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Crouzet, Capital Formation in the Industrial Revolution (London: Methuen, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dobb, Studies in the Development of Capitalism (London: Routledge, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dunford and D. Perrons, The Arena of Capital (London: Macmillan, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fevre, ‘Contract work in the recession’ in K. Purcell et al. (eds), The Changing Experience of Employment (London: Macmillan, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fevre, Wales is Closed (Nottingham: Spokesman, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Friedman, Industry and Labor (London: Macmillan, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gerry, Recession, Restructuring and the Rediscovery of the ‘Black Economy’. Paper to Annual Conference of British Sociological Association, Cardiff, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Goffee, ‘The butty system and the Kent coalfield’, Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History, No. 34, 1977, pp. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Goffee, ‘Incorporation and conflict: a case study of subcontracting in the coal industry’, Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1981, pp. 475–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Gregory, Regional Transformation and the Industrial Revolution: A Geography of the Yorkshire Woollen Industry (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • B. Hammond and J. L. Hammond, The Skilled Labourer1760–1832 (London: Longmans, 1919).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Harrigan, Strategic Flexibility: A Management Guide to Changing Times (Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Harte and K. Ponting (eds), Textile History and Economic History (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Heaton, The Yorkshire Woollen and Worsted Industries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Heaton, ‘Financing the Industrial Revolution’ in Crouzet 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Heywood, ‘The rural hosiery industry of the lower Champagne region 1750–1850’, Textile History, Vol. 7, 1976, pp. 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Hilton, Are Trade Unions Obstructive? (London: Victor Gollancz, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hilton (ed.), The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. J. Hobsbawm, Labouring Men (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hudson, ‘Proto-industrialization: The Case of the West Riding Wool Textile Industry in the 18th and early 19th centuries’, History Workshop, 12, 1981, pp. 34–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Hurstfield, ‘A route to inefficiency — compulsory contracting’, Low Pay Review, No. 29, 1987a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hurstfield, ‘The tender trap: the effects of the local government bill’, Low Pay Review, No. 31, 1987b.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. T. Jenkins, The West Riding Wool Textile Industry 1770–1835: A Study of Fixed Capital Formation (Bath: Pasold Research Fund, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. T. Jenkins and K. G. Ponting, The British Wool Textile Industry1770–1914 (London: Pasold/Heinemann, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Joyce, Work, Society and Politics (London: Methuen, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Littler, ‘Internal contract and the transition to modern work systems’, in D. Dunkerley and G. Salaman The International Yearbook of Organisational Studies (London: Routledge, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Littler, ‘Deskilling and changing structures of control’ in S. Wood (ed.), The Degradation of Work (London: Hutchinson, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. De L.Mann, The Cloth Industry in the West of England from 1640 to 1880 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Marglin, ‘What do bosses do?’, Review of Radical Political Economy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1974, pp. 60–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Marx, Capital, Vol. 1 (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Melossi and M. Pavarini, The Prison and the Factory: Origins of the Penitentiary System (London: Macmillan, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Pinchbeck, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution (London: Routledge, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Pollard, The Genesis of Modern Management (London: Edward Arnold, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Poliert, The ‘Flexible Firm’: A Model in Search of Reality (or a Policy in Search of a Practice)?, Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 19 (Warwick: Industrial Relations Research Unit, University of Warwick, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Poliert, ‘Dismantling “flexibility”’, Capital and Class, No. 34, May, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. F. Rainnie, The Woollen and Worsted Industry: An Economic Analysis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Samuel, ‘The workshop of the world’, History Workshop, No. 3, 1977, pp. 6–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Schremmer, ‘The textile industry in southern Germany 1750–1850’, Textile History, Vol. 7, 1976, pp. 60–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Sigsworth, Black Dyke Mills (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. J. Smelser, Social Change in the Industrial Revolution (London: Routledge, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Taylor, ‘The sub/contract system in the British coal industry’ in L. S. Presnell (ed.), Studies in the Industrial Revolution (London: Athlone Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Ure, The Philosophy of Manufactures (New York: Kelley, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation (New York: Free Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wool Textile EDC, Progress Report 1980 (London: NEDO, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Stephen Kendrick Pat Straw David McCrone

Copyright information

© 1990 The British Sociological Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fevre, R. (1990). Sub/contracting and Industrial Development. In: Kendrick, S., Straw, P., McCrone, D. (eds) Interpreting the Past, Understanding the Present. Explorations in Sociology. British Sociological Association Conference Volume Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20786-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics