Skip to main content
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

This article is mainly an attempt to understand the nature of disparity in Brodsky’s similes. It will explore the structural, semantic, poetic and conceptual aspects of his similes.

Reason respects the differences and imagination the similitudes of things.

Shelley

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, G. Genette, Figures of Literary Discourse, Alan Sheridan (tr.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yazykovye protsessy sovremennoi russkoi khudozhestvennoi literatury. Poezia, A.D. Grigoryeva (ed.) (Moskva: Nauka, 1977), p. 241

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.A. Baskina, E.A. Nekrasova, Evoliutsiya poeticheskoi rechi XIX–XXvv. Perifraza. Sravnenie. (Moskva, Nauka, 1986), p. 89

    Google Scholar 

  4. See V.I. Dyakov, ‘Sravneniya Turgeneva in Turgenev i ego vremia,’ N.L. Brodsky (ed.) (Moskva, 1923), pp. 77–141

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Proffer, The Simile and Gogol’s ‘Dead Souls’ (Paris: Mouton, The Hague, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Loseff’s article ‘Zhizn’ kak metafora’ in Mikhail Eriomin, Stikhotvoreniya (Tenafly: Hermitage, 1986), pp. 137–51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. V.V. Vinogradov, Russkii yazyk, 2nd edn (Moskva: Nauka, 1972), p. 555.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V.V. Vinogradov, Stil’ Pushkina, (Moskva, 1941), p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Translated by Brodsky, The New York Review, 18 February 1988, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The reference here is to B. Eikhenbaum, Anna Akhmatova (Petrograd, 1923)

    Google Scholar 

  11. N.A. Kuzmina, ‘Probivayas’ moguchim potokom’, Russkay a rech, 1977, No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.A. Nekrasova, ‘Stravneniya v stikhotvornykh tekstakh’, Yazykovye protsessy v sovremennoi ruskoi poezii (Moskva: Nauka, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. I have dealt with this problem in my article ‘Grammatika metafory i khudozhestvennyi smysl’, Poetika Brodskogo, edn, L. Loseff, (Tenafly: Hermitage, 1986), pp. 70, 93–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.D. Arutiunova, ‘Yazykovaya metafora (Sintaksis i leksika)’, Lingvistika i poetika (Moskva: Nauka, 1979), p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  15. (Brodsky, A Part of Speech, OUP, 1980, p. 140).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brodsky often provides an interpretation of his own imagery in his prose: ‘but leaves … This I suppose is where the concept of majority came from’ Marbles, Tr. by Alan Myers with Brodsky Comparative Criticism, v. 7 (Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Brodsky’s essays on Tsvetaeva, W.H. Auden, on Russian writers in Less than One (London: Penguin, 1986), pp. 176–383.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Mamardashvili, A. Piatigorsky, Simvol i soznanie (Jerusalem: Maler, 1982), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polukhina, V. (1990). Similarity in Disparity. In: Loseff, L., Polukhina, V. (eds) Brodsky’s Poetics and Aesthetics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20765-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics