Skip to main content

Abstract

Brodsky once happened to say: ‘Politics and poetry do have something in common — the letter p and the letter o’. A literalist might point out other common letters as well, and also that poetry in general, and Brodsky’s poetry in particular, always has political motifs — whether hidden or exposed — and that any text influences its reader’s political conduct in some measure. Brodsky is merely reminding us here of poetry’s autonomy and priority as a type of ideological activity.1 This is particularly important for him as a Russian poet, inasmuch as the tradition of dealing with literature in political terms has been unusually long-lived on Russian soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In this article the poems ‘Letter in a Bottle’ and ‘A Stop in a Desert’ are quoted from Iosif Brodsky, Ostanovka v pustyne, New York: Izdatel’-stvo imeni Chekhova, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  2. In Andrey Platonov, The Foundation Pit (Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1973), p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marina Tsvetaeva, Stikhotvoreniya i poemy v pyati tomakh, t.3 (New York: Russica, 1983), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Sonnet 2 in ‘Twenty Sonnets for Mary Stuart’ (Iosif Brodsky, Chast’ rechi (Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1976), p. 51).

    Google Scholar 

  5. On Brodsky’s constant metaphors see Valentina Polukhina, Joseph Brodsky: A Poet for Our Time (Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. ‘Flight from Bysantium’ in Joseph Brodsky, Less Than One, New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux [1986], pp. 396–446.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sergey Esenin, Sobranie sochineniy v 5 tomakh, t.2, Moscow: ‘Khudozhestvennaya literatura’, 1966, p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See e.g. Sergey Bulgakov, Filosofiya khozyaystva, Moscow: Put’, 1912 (reprint: New York: Chalidze Publications, 1982), pp. 242–43 and 307–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted by Ia. Gerchin in Neva no. 2, 1989, p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This idea is emphatically expressed at the end of Victor Veidle’s article ‘Peterburgskaya poetika’ in N. Gumilyov, Sobranie sochineniy, t.4, Washington: Izdatelstvo knizhnogo magazina Victor Kamkin Inc., 1964, pp. xxxv–xxxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Czeslaw Milosz, Poezje, Warszawa: Czytelnik, 1981, p. 88

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aleksandr Blok, Sobranie sochineniy v 8 tomakh, t.3, Moscow-Leningrad: GIKhL, 1960, p. 259

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iosif Brodsky, Stikhotvoreniya i poemy, New York: Inter-Language Literary Associates, 1965, pp. 189–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loseff, L. (1990). Politics/Poetics. In: Loseff, L., Polukhina, V. (eds) Brodsky’s Poetics and Aesthetics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20765-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics