Skip to main content

The Search for a New Role: The European Circle after 1956

  • Chapter
Losing an Empire, Finding a Role
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

As noted in earlier chapters, throughout the postwar period successive British governments found it increasingly difficult, in the face of Britain’s long-term relative economic decline, to sustain the strategy of maintaining British influence in all three of Churchill’s ‘circles’. In Chapter 4 it was suggested that, from the mid-1950s onwards, partly as a result of indigenous nationalism and partly because of the diminishing importance of Britain’s imperial trade, Britain’s involvement in the Empire circle was gradually reduced. As will be seen in Chapter 6, by the 1960s, with the process of decolonisation well under way, Britain was also becoming less important to the United States as a strategically in the global struggle against ‘communist expansionism’. The obvious corollary to this reduction of influence in both the ‘Empire’ and ‘Atlantic’ circles was for the focus of Britain’s foreign policy to shift towards Europe. It was increasingly recognised in the years after Suez that it was here that Britain’s primary economic and political interests were located; that if Britain wished to retain a significant voice in world affairs, then it would have to do so in concert with its allies in Western Europe. The strategic shift towards Europe was not accomplished without difficulty, however. Significant problems were encountered in the 1960s as Britain attempted to institutionalise its European connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. The Council of Europe was loosely based on an idea mooted by Churchill in September 1945. The original members were Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Ireland and Italy. They were subsequently joined by Iceland, West Germany, Greece, Turkey and Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Altiero Spinelli, The Eurocrats, Conflict and Crisis in the EEC (trans. C. Grove Haines) (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See J. S. Nye, Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organisation (Boston: Little, Brown, 1971) especially chs 1–3;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe (London: Oxford University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The original ‘six’ of the subsequent EEC were: France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  6. CMND 13, Agreement concerning the Relations between the United Kingdom and the European Coal and Steel Community (21 Dec. 1954). This in many respects unique agreement in fact gave the UK government and industry direct access to the High Authority and, therefore, to the decision-making structure of the ECSC itself.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This is not to say, however, that Whitehall was entirely unaware of the changes that were under way. The shift in the pattern of Britain’s external trade was certainly anticipated by Sir Frank Lee, then Permanent Undersecretary at the Board of Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  8. An additional reason for Britain’s lack of interest in the EEC at this stage was the belief — widely held in British foreign policy circles — that French opposition would prevent the plans for the proposed EEC from coming into fruition. It was only after Suez had ‘bounced’ the French into the EEC and Euratom ventures that the British realised that they would indeed have to face a de facto customs union among the Six.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CMND 9842, Agreement between … the United Kingdom and … the Federal Republic of Germany for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy (31 July 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  10. CMND 458, Agreement between … the United Kingdom and the Government of the Italian Republic for Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy (23 Dec. 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. CMND 1313, [Three] Exchanges of Notes between … the United Kingdom and … the Federal Republic of Germany concerning Local Defence Costs of UK forces stationed in the Federal Republic … (7 June 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  12. CMND 1080, Exchange of Notes between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands concerning the Arrangements to Facilitate Travel between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (1 April 1960); CMND 1157 (20 June 1960: as CMND 1080 but refers to the Federal German Republic); CMND 1357 Exchange of Notes between the … United Kingdom and… Luxembourg concerning the Acceptance of the British Visitors Passport for Travel between the UK and Luxembourg (21 Feb. 1961); CMND 1354 (21 Feb. 1961: title as CMND 1357 but refers to Belgium); CMND 1355 (21 Feb. 1961: title as CMND 1357 but refers to the Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  13. David Coombes, Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community: A Portrait of the Commission of the EEC (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1970) p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peter Calvocoressi, World Politics since 1945, Fourth Edition (London: Longman, 1982) pp. 167–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CMND 2108 Polaris. Sales Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom … and the Government of the United States of America (4 June 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallace, The Foreign Policy Process pp. 85–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alan Campbell, ‘Anglo-French relations a decade ago: a new assessment (1)’, International Affairs, vol. 58, no. 2 (1982) pp. 237–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. CMND 5179, Treaty concerning the Accession of… the United Kingdom … to the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community including the Act concerning the conditions of Accession and the Adjustment to the Treaties … (1 Jan. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Warsaw Treaty Organisation was created in 1955. Its members are USSR, Poland, the German Democratic Republic, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania and Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sanders, Lawmaking and Cooperation, pp. 21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Colville, The Fringes of Power, p. 683.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (Oxford University Press, 1985) attributes the phrase to Theodore Roosevelt (p. 408).

    Google Scholar 

  23. CMND 1076, Five Year Trade Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (24 May 1959); CMND 917, Agreement between the … United Kingdom and… the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on relations in the Scientific, Technological, Educational and Cultural fields, 1960–61 (1 Dec. 1959); CMND 2557, Protocol for the prolongation of the Five Year Trade Agreement between … the United Kingdom and … the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (23 April 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  24. CMND 4705, Long-Term Economic and Trade Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom … and the Government of the Polish People’s Republic (21 April 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  25. CMND 5016, Long-Term Economic and Trade Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom … and the Government of the Hungarian People’s Republic (21 March 1972); CMND 5074, Long-Term Economic and Trade Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom … and the Government of… Czechoslovakia (27 June 1982); CMND 5106, Long-Term Economic and Trade Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom … and the Socialist Republic of Romania (15 June 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  26. CMND 5286, Long-Term Agreement on the Development of Economic, Industrial, Scientific and Technical Co-operation between the Government of the United Kingdom … and the Government of the Polish People’s Republic (20 March 1973); CMND 5552, Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom … and the Government of the German Democratic Republic on the Development of Economic, Industrial, Scientific and Technical Co-operation (18 Dec. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  27. The actual figures were: in favour, 48 per cent; opposed, 26 per cent; don’t know, 26 per cent. See Younger, ‘Public Opinion and British Foreign Policy’ p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Calvocoressi, World Politics, p. 171. For a discussion of the Kennedy Round negotiations, see Coombes, Politics and Bureaucracy, pp. 166– 216.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For a provocative — and entertaining — view of the decline, see Corelli Barnet, The Audit of War: the Illusion and Reality of Britain as a Great Nation (London: Macmillan, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  30. This tendency is documented extensively in Peter Willetts, The Non-Aligned Movement: The Origins of a Third World Alliance (London: Frances Pinter, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  31. See, for example, C. E. Carrington, ‘Between the Commonwealth and Europe’, International Affairs, vol. 38, no. 2 (1962) pp. 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. The three exceptions were Finland, Norway and Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See, for example, Frank Longstreth, ‘The City, Industry and the State’, in Colin Crouch (ed.), State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism (London: Croom Helm, 1979) pp. 157–90.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jonathan Lynn and Anthony Jay, Yes, Prime Minister: the Diaries of the Right Hon. James Hacker, Volume II (London: BBC Books, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  35. France (after 1966) and the Irish Republic were not full NATO members.

    Google Scholar 

  36. There were nine such decisions in 1974 and 10 in 1975. See, for example, CMND 6258, Decisions of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community meeting in Council, opening, allocating and providing for the allocation of Tariff Quotas and opening Tariff Preferences for certain Steel Products originating in Developing Countries (2 Dec. 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  37. A 2:1 majority voted in favour of continued membership of the Community in June 1975 (67.2 per cent Yes; 32.8 per cent No).

    Google Scholar 

  38. See Helen Wallace, ‘The British Presidency of the European Community’s Council of Ministers: the opportunity to persuade’, International Affairs, vol. 64, no. 4 (1986) pp. 583–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. For details, see Jan-Erik Lane and Svante O. Ersson, Politics and Society in Western Europe (London: Sage, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Joseph Frankel, ‘Conventional and theorising diplomats: a critique’, International Affairs, vol. 57, no. 3 (1981) p. 547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wallace, ‘The British Presidency of the European Community’s Council of Ministers’, p. 585.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See, for example, Leon Lindberg, Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration (London: Oxford University Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lord Gladwyn, ‘Western Europe’s Collective Defence’, International Affairs, vol. 51, no. 2 (1975) p. 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Douglas Hurd, ‘Prospects for Europe: Political Co-operation’, International Affairs, vol. 57, no. 3 (1981) p. 383. It is also worth noting that the Single European Act of 1986 extended EPC still further. The aim before 1986 was to provide a consultative framework that could be used if the political will was there: after 1986, consultation through EPC became a legal requirement.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. James Eberle, John Roper, William Wallace and Phil Williams, ‘European Security Cooperation and British interests’, International Affairs, vol. 60, no. 4 (1984) p. 546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Evan Luard, ‘A European Foreign Policy?’ International Affairs, vol. 62, no. 4 (1986) p. 576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. The Independent European Arms Procurement Group was created in 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  48. These took place largely within the framework of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe which arose out of the Helsinki Final Act of 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hurd, ‘Prospects for Europe’, p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  50. For details of these matters, see Geoffrey Edwards, ‘Europe and the Falkland Islands crisis 1982’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 22, no. 4 (1984) pp. 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Greece became a full EC member in January 1981; Spain and Portugal in January 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Luard, ‘A European Foreign Policy?’, p. 580.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 David Sanders

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanders, D. (1989). The Search for a New Role: The European Circle after 1956. In: Losing an Empire, Finding a Role. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20747-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20747-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-44266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20747-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics