Advertisement

Conclusion: Land, Commerce and the Limits of Tradition

  • John Morrow

Abstract

Property was important in Coleridge’s political theory because he regarded it as a crucial factor accounting for the existence of power, for the ways in which it was distributed, and the manner in which its exercise should be institutionalised and structured. Over the course of his lifetime, however, Coleridge’s understanding of the political and moral implications of property underwent significant changes. Having initially believed that the relationship between property and political power made both property and the state morally problematic, he nevertheless argued in favour of the equalisation of power and influence by means of the erosion of property differentials and the diffusion of property throughout society. These aspirations were closely related to the participatory ideals associated with classical republican theory, but by 1800 Coleridge had reverted to a more conservative use of these discourses, one that made political participation dependent upon existing patterns of ownership. He now regarded a divorce between property and political power as a major threat to the stability and to the moral usefulness of European polities. Regimes that were not grounded on property generated political systems based on personal power, not on the institutionalisation of social forces connected with proprietorship.

Keywords

Political Power Political Theory Personal Power European Polity Platonic Conception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Ibid., p. 173. For this interpretation of Coleridge’s use of Kant see D. M. MacKinnon, ‘Coleridge and Kant’, in John Beer (ed.), Coleridge’s Variety (1974) p. 191.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    For an account of the political implications of Coleridge’s interest in the seventeenth century see John Morrow, ‘Coleridge and the English Revolution’, Political Science, 40 (1988) 128–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    David Newsome, Two Classes of Men: Platonism and English Romantic Thought (1974) p. 17;Google Scholar
  4. Robert O. Preyer, ‘Coleridge’s Historical Thought’, in Kathleen Coburn (ed.), Coleridge: A Collection of Critical Essays (Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1967) p. 152.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Thomas Arnold, ‘National Church Establishments’ and ‘Church Politics’, in The Miscellaneous Works of Thomas Arnold D. D. (New York, 1845) pp. 510, 437, 493.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    Edmund Burke, An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs, in Works of the Rt Hon. Edmund Burke, 16 vols (1826) vi, 218.Google Scholar
  7. The argument of the following passage (and indeed of the preceding chapter as well) is at odds with that presented in the concluding chapter of Nigel Leask’s The Politics of Imagination in Coleridge’s Critical Thought (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    James K. Chandler, Wordsworth’s Second Nature: A Study of the Poetry and Politics (Chicago, 1984) p. 67.Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    See for example Charles Smith, Seven Letters on National Religion (1833).Google Scholar
  10. 19.
    For Coleridge’s connection with the British Association see Jack Morrell and A. Thackray, Gentlemen of Science (Oxford, 1984); on the moderation of this body see ch. 6.Google Scholar
  11. 20.
    See Charles Richard Sanders, Coleridge and the Broad Church Movement (Durham, NC, 1942); andGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan Forbes, The Liberal Anglican Idea of History (Cambridge, 1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 21.
    J. S. Mill, ‘Coleridge’, in Mill on Bentham and Coleridge, ed. F. R. Leavis (1965) p. 155.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    See for example T. H. Green, Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, ed. Paul Harris and John Morrow (Cambridge, 1986) pp. 5, 8, 328, 360–6; andGoogle Scholar
  15. J. H. Muirhead, Coleridge as Philosopher (1930) passim.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Morrow 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Morrow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsVictoria University of WellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations