Skip to main content

Hampton Court Revisited: A Re-evaluation of the Consumer

  • Chapter
Readings in Popular Culture

Part of the book series: Insights ((ISI))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The Hampton Court maze survives as a relic of the Wilderness Gardens created by William III’s royal gardeners in the 1690s. Its status in relation to the Palace is a peripheral one, its current survival based on the assumption that it functions as an idiosyncratic quirk in contrast to the organised sedentary of the main gardens. However, in one important sense the maze, or more exactly the idea of the maze, signifies at a cultural level; and this is manifested through the way in which the deceptions, reversals and trickery of the maze apply to the ways in which knowledge is consumed within the Palace itself.

The Palace

Hampton Court is not for the hurried visitor. A treasure trove of royal history, architectural gems, great paintings and stunning gardens, its delights are best experienced at a leisurely pace, with frequent rests along the way, simply to take stock. Whether a student of history, a lover of beauty or a keen gardener, there is something for everyone, which is why many visitors come back time and again. Hampton Court grows with the knowing. [An official guide book.l]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Oughton, E. et al., Hampton Court Palace (London: The Department of the Environment, 1988) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chettle, C. H. and J. Charlton, Hampton Court Palace (Edinburgh: HMSO, 1982) p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, R., Marxism and Literature (Oxford: Clarendon, 1978) p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dews, P., Logics of Disintegration: post-structuralist thought and the claims of critical theory (London: Verso, 1987) p. 161. Please note that Dews is here less expressing an opinion than passing comment on M. Foucault’s concept of the subject via a critique of power and discourse.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, J., quoted in D. Hebdige, Subculture: the Meaning of Style (London: Methuen, 1986) p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Althusser, L., For Marx, translated B. Brewster (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969) pp. 87–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Gary Day

Copyright information

© 1990 The Editorial Board, Lumière (Co-operative) Press Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, A. (1990). Hampton Court Revisited: A Re-evaluation of the Consumer. In: Day, G. (eds) Readings in Popular Culture. Insights . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20700-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics