Abstract
The first thing to avoid in thinking about pornography is trying to define ‘pornography’. Trying to distinguish pornography from erotica or to define its proper limits is either misconceived or mischievous. Just as we can discuss tables, chairs, typewriters and handbags — or murder, art and responsibility — without being able to define them so we can discuss pornographic pictures, writing and advertising without being able to define ‘pornography’. I am not implying that, however obscurely, ‘we all know what we mean’ in some (quasi-)intuitive fashion, I am simply making the point that within the limits of our fallibility and the parameters of historical and related circumstances, we can quite unproblematically discuss myriads of things which we cannot define in terms of formal ideas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Brown, Beverley, ‘A Feminist Interest in Pornography — Some Modest Proposals’, in m/f, 5–6 (1981), pp. 12–13.
Coward, Rosalind, ‘What Is Pornography?’, in Spare Rib, 119 (1982), p. 52.
Coward, Rosalind, ‘Sexual Violence and Sexuality’, in Feminist Review 11 (1982), p. 11—still one of the best essays available on pornography.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1990 The Editorial Board, Lumière (Co-operative) Press Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brecher, B. (1990). Illiberal Thoughts on ‘Page 3’. In: Day, G. (eds) Readings in Popular Culture. Insights . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20700-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20700-8_18
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-47523-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20700-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)