Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Language, Discourse, Society ((LDS))

  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

The world-wide crisis of capitalism which has been gaining momentum since the early 1970’s has simultaneously elevated Marxism to a new status. The collapse of both neo-Marxist and Keynesian certainties that late capitalism possessed an almost infinite capacity to stave off a breakdown led social and economic theory to look once more to “classical” Marxist explanations of the crisis. Within academic circles there is no question that Marxist political economy, although by no means hegemonic, gains new adherents with each passing leading indicator showing a more or less chronic tendency in the western countries towards stagnation if not complete reversal of the almost thirty years of uninterrupted growth in most capitalist nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See particularly, Max Weber, Theory of Social and Economic Organization, ed. Talcott Parsons (New York: Free Press, 1947), especially “The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology,” pp. 87–156

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emile Durkheim, Sociology and Philosophy (New York: Free Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karl Marx, Capital, Volume 2 (Chicago: Charles Kerr Co., 1909), pp. 56–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Maynard Keynes, General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (New York: Macmillan, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas Kuhn, Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl Popper, Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Science Editions, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. I. Lenin, ImperialismThe Highest Stage of Capitalism, in Selected Works, Vol. 5 (New York: International Publishers, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosa Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Rudolph Hilferding, Finanzkapital (1909)

    Google Scholar 

  10. and more recently, Michael Hudson, Super-Imperialism (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Barratt-Brown, After Imperialism (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Lenin’s Left Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley Aronowitz, “Left-Wing Communism: The reply to Lenin,” in The Unknown Dimension, ed. Dick Howard and Karl Klare (New York: Basic Books, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Georg Lukács, History and Class Consciousness (London: Merlin Press, 1971), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Durost and Barton, Farming and Markets for Farm Goods (Washington: Committee for Economic Development, no. 15, 1960), p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andre Gorz, “Colonialism at Home and Abroad,” in Socialism and Revolution (New York: Anchor Books, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harry Magdoff, The Age of Imperialism (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  18. “Reply to Critics,” Social Policy, 1:2 (Sept.–Oct., 1970).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paul Baran and Paul Sweezy, Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Andre Gunder Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Samir Amin, Accumulation on a World Scale (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. H. Cardoso and Enzo Faletto, Dependencia y Desarrollo En America Latino (Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roman Rosdolsky, Making of Marx’sCapital” (London: Pluto Press, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paul Mattick, Marx and Keynes (Boston: Porter Seargant, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Michel Aglietta, A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The U.S. Experience, trans. David Fernbach (London: New Left Books, 1979). I am using the term “capital-logic” in a somewhat broader sense than it is normally employed. The “school” refers to such economists as J. Hirsch, Paul Mattick and others who derive their entire social theory from the Marxian economic formulas. The work of Ernest Mandel and Michel Aglietta appears to be more broadly based, but my contention is that their position is commensurable with that of the capital-logicians.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Stanley Aronowitz, “Marx, Braverman and the Logic of Capital,” Insurgent Sociologist (Winter 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Christian Palloix, “The Labor Process: From Fordism to Neo-Fordism,” in The Labor Process and Class Strategies, CSE Pamphlet no. 1 (London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stuart Ewen, Captains of Consciousness (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  30. David Noble, America by Design (New York: Pantheon Books, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ernest Mandel, Late Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1975). In this book, perhaps the most elaborate effort from the perspective of capital-logic to take account of the recent history of world capitalism, Mandel directly confronts the explanations offered by dependency theory while attempting to integrate the work of Amin, Frank and Emmanuel within a more or less classical Marxist position based on the categories of value and surplus value rather than exchange relations. Mandel works within the parameters of Marxist theory to refute both underconsumptionist and dependency notions.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Paul Mattick, “Les limites de l’intégration: l’homme unidimensionnel dans la société de classe,” in Intégration Capitaliste et Rupture Ouvrière (Paris: EDI, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  33. The best discussion of the political consequences of the social wage is James O’Connor, Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  34. See James O’Connor, “Productive and Unproductive Labor,” Politics and Society, 5:3, for a discussion of this point in greater detail. The idea of disaccumulation was first advanced in this country by Martin Sklar in an article in Radical America (1969).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Anthony Giddens, Central Problems in Social Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Henry Nash Smith, Virgin Land (New York: 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  37. See William Appleman Williams, Contour of American History (Chicago: Quadrangle Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gar Alpervitz, Atomic Diplomacy (New York, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. F. Fleming, Origins of the Cold War (Boston, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gabriel Kolko, The Roots of U.S. Foreign Policy (New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fredric Jameson, “Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture,” Social Text, no. 1 (Winter 1979), pp. 130–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Stanley Aronowitz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aronowitz, S. (1990). The End of Political Economy. In: The Crisis in Historical Materialism. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20696-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics