Skip to main content

Ideology and Pragmatism in Economic Thatcherism

  • Chapter
Ideas and Politics in Modern Britain
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

Ideology is often contrasted with pragmatism. But of course no policy was ever made, however ‘pragmatic’, without ideology, that is a set of informing ideas on causes and effects. For example, the policies of the Heath/Wilson/Callaghan Governments of the 1970s were all based on the ideology of corporatism, a corpus of thinking that others in this volume have defined and criticised. Yet proponents of these policies have often defended themselves as being more pragmatic and less ideological than their Thatcherite successors in the 1980s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See, for example, M. Friedman, ‘The Role of Monetary Policy’, American Economic Review, 58 (1968): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.g., J. M. Buchanan and G. Tullock, The Calculus of Consent (Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Baumol, ‘Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industrial Structure’, American Economic Review, 72 (1982): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For an early example of this mode of thought see R. E. Lucas, Jr., ‘Some International Evidence on Output in Inflation Trade-Offs’, American Economic Review, 68 (1973): 326–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Minford and P. Ashton, ‘The Poverty Trap and the Laffer Curve -What Can the GHS Tell Us?’, CEPR discussion paper, 275 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. V. Brown, E. J. Levin, P. J. Rosa, R. J. Raffell and D. T. Ulph, Taxation and Family Labour Supply: Final Report of H.M. Treasury Project (London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Maki and A. Spindler, ‘The Effect of Unemployment Compensation on the Rate of Unemployment in Great Britain’, Oxford Economic Papers, 27 (1975): 440–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Benjamin and L. Kochin, ‘Searching for an Explanation of Unemployment in Interwar Britain’, Journal of Political Economy, 87 (1979): 441–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Published eventually in articles and in P. Minford, D. Davies, M. Peel and A. Sprague, Unemployment: Cause and Cure (London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Layard and S. Nickell, ‘The Causes of British Unemployment’, National Institute Economic Review, 3 (February 1985): 62–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Patrick Minford

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Minford, P. (1990). Ideology and Pragmatism in Economic Thatcherism. In: Clark, J.C.D. (eds) Ideas and Politics in Modern Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20686-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics