Advertisement

The Gentleman’s Excuse-me: The Male Apologist and the Experience of Realism in James Herbert’s The Magic Cottage

  • Andrew Smith
Part of the Insights book series

Abstract

The history of the work of James Herbert is a travelogue of popular success. His work conceptualises many of the themes and concerns about romance and power, which have themselves been popularised through cultural dissemination and cultural articulation.

Keywords

Romantic Love Hide Capacity Critical Practice Expressive Realism Cultural Dissemination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    James Herbert, The Magic Cottage (London: New English Library, 1986). The page references in the text refer to this edition.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Letter from James Herbert to the author.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    This refers of course to the outlines of this theory as stated in Catherine Belsey, Critical Practice (London: Methuen, 1980).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jessica Benjamin, ‘Master and Slave, the Literature of Erotic Domination’, in A. B. Snitow (ed.), Desire (London: Virago, 1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibid., p. 306.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    David Punter, The Literature of Terror (London: Longman, 1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosemary Jackson, Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion (London: Methuen, 1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibid., p. 124.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibid., P. 4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p. 23.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    In particular this refers to Derridan explorations.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Belsey, Critical Practice, p. 3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raymond Williams, Marxism and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978) pp. 108–10.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Belsey, Critical Practice, p. 136.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Punter, The Literature of Terror, p. 20.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belsey, Critical Practice, p. 109.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jackson, Fantasy, see especially pp. 37–42 (‘non-signification’).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Belsey, Critical Practice, p. 81.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jackson, Fantasy, p. 36.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Belsey, Critical Practice, p. 45.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vic Seidler, The Sexuality of Men, ed. Andrew Metcalf and Peter Humphries (London: Pluto, 1985).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jackson, Fantasy, p. 154.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Belsey, Critical Practice, p. 46.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibid., p. 54.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christopher Norris, Deconstruction (London: Methuen, 1982) pp. 129–32.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Williams, Marxism and Literature, p. 164.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibid., p. 37.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid., p. 38.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid., p. 166.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Letter from James Herbert to the author.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Belsey, Critical Practice, p. 107.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jackson, Fantasy, p. 52.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ibid., p. 40.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Punter, The Literature of Terror, p. 417.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jacques Lacan, cited in Christine Brooke-Rose, Rhetoric of the Un-Real (London: Cambridge University Press, 1982) p. 182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations