Abstract
Poet and teller of supernatural tales, literary critic and theorist, philosophical speculator, author of marginalia, plagiarist, laudanum taker: Edgar Allan Poe (1809–49) was something of an American Coleridge. He knew Coleridge’s works well and had no hesitation in making use of them. In the first half of this century Poe scholars busied themselves documenting the influence; they did not, however, stop to consider its dynamics, consequences, or theoretical implications. In 1930 Floyd Stovall undertook a comprehensive survey of ‘Poe’s Debt to Coleridge’, and concluded that he had validated the opinion of one of Poe’s first biographers that Coleridge was ‘the guiding genius of Poe’s entire intellectual life’.1 But he did not make it his business to ask whether the notion of a ‘guiding genius’ might be problematic in view of Poe’s much-vaunted claim to originality — ‘My first object (as usual) was originality’, he said of his ballad The Raven.2 Similarly, the scholars who revealed Poe’s unacknowledged borrowings from A. W. Schlegel,3 did not reflect upon the uncanny, one might even say Poe-like, correspondence to Coleridge’s dealings with Schlegel. Thomas McFarland’s discussions of ‘The Originality Paradox’ and ‘The Problem of Coleridge’s Plagiarisms’ have given us a theoretical framework in which to re-read Poe’s relationship with Coleridge. It will be the contention of this essay that while his considerable debt was at times covered up, it was in a variety of ways paid off.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Floyd Stovall, ‘Poe’s Debt to Coleridge’, University of Texas Studies in English X (1930) 70–127.
Darrel Abel, ‘Coleridge’s “Life-inDeath” and Poe’s “Death-in-Life” ’, Notes and Queries, cc (1955) 218–20;
and Gerald E. Gerber, ‘The Coleridgean Context of Poe’s Blackwood Satires, in ‘Poe Symposium’, ed. R. P. Benton, Emerson Society Quarterly, LX, Supplement (1970) 87–91.
See F. C. Prescott’s introduction to his Selections from the Critical Writings of Edgar Allan Poe ( New York: Henry Holt, 1909 );
Margaret Alterton, Origins of Poe’s Critical Theory (Iowa City: University of Iowa Humanistic Studies, vol. II no. 3, 1925);
Albert J. Lubell, ‘Poe and A. W. Schlegel’, JEGP, LII (1953) 1–12.
This controversy is discussed in CL II, 1191, notes, and Norman Fruman, Coleridge, the Damaged Archangel (New York: George Braziller, 1971) pp. 142–3.
See Clark Griffith, ‘Poe’s “Ligeia” and the English Romantics’, University of Toronto Quarterly XXIV (1954–5) 8–25, quotation from p. 19.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bate, J. (1990). Edgar Allan Poe: A Debt Repaid. In: Gravil, R., Lefebure, M. (eds) The Coleridge Connection. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20667-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20667-4_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-20669-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20667-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)