Skip to main content

Edgar Allan Poe: A Debt Repaid

  • Chapter
The Coleridge Connection
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

Poet and teller of supernatural tales, literary critic and theorist, philosophical speculator, author of marginalia, plagiarist, laudanum taker: Edgar Allan Poe (1809–49) was something of an American Coleridge. He knew Coleridge’s works well and had no hesitation in making use of them. In the first half of this century Poe scholars busied themselves documenting the influence; they did not, however, stop to consider its dynamics, consequences, or theoretical implications. In 1930 Floyd Stovall undertook a comprehensive survey of ‘Poe’s Debt to Coleridge’, and concluded that he had validated the opinion of one of Poe’s first biographers that Coleridge was ‘the guiding genius of Poe’s entire intellectual life’.1 But he did not make it his business to ask whether the notion of a ‘guiding genius’ might be problematic in view of Poe’s much-vaunted claim to originality — ‘My first object (as usual) was originality’, he said of his ballad The Raven.2 Similarly, the scholars who revealed Poe’s unacknowledged borrowings from A. W. Schlegel,3 did not reflect upon the uncanny, one might even say Poe-like, correspondence to Coleridge’s dealings with Schlegel. Thomas McFarland’s discussions of ‘The Originality Paradox’ and ‘The Problem of Coleridge’s Plagiarisms’ have given us a theoretical framework in which to re-read Poe’s relationship with Coleridge. It will be the contention of this essay that while his considerable debt was at times covered up, it was in a variety of ways paid off.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Floyd Stovall, ‘Poe’s Debt to Coleridge’, University of Texas Studies in English X (1930) 70–127.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Darrel Abel, ‘Coleridge’s “Life-inDeath” and Poe’s “Death-in-Life” ’, Notes and Queries, cc (1955) 218–20;

    Google Scholar 

  3. and Gerald E. Gerber, ‘The Coleridgean Context of Poe’s Blackwood Satires, in ‘Poe Symposium’, ed. R. P. Benton, Emerson Society Quarterly, LX, Supplement (1970) 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See F. C. Prescott’s introduction to his Selections from the Critical Writings of Edgar Allan Poe ( New York: Henry Holt, 1909 );

    Google Scholar 

  5. Margaret Alterton, Origins of Poe’s Critical Theory (Iowa City: University of Iowa Humanistic Studies, vol. II no. 3, 1925);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Albert J. Lubell, ‘Poe and A. W. Schlegel’, JEGP, LII (1953) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This controversy is discussed in CL II, 1191, notes, and Norman Fruman, Coleridge, the Damaged Archangel (New York: George Braziller, 1971) pp. 142–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Clark Griffith, ‘Poe’s “Ligeia” and the English Romantics’, University of Toronto Quarterly XXIV (1954–5) 8–25, quotation from p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bate, J. (1990). Edgar Allan Poe: A Debt Repaid. In: Gravil, R., Lefebure, M. (eds) The Coleridge Connection. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20667-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics