Abstract
Until today the problem of totalitarian literature and art has been looked at almost exclusively from a political point of view. The main focus of interest has been on the mechanisms of ‘Gleichschaltung’, the forcing into line during the 1930s. In Germany, for instance, it was initiated by the ‘Reichskulturkammergesetz’ of September 1933 and, in the Soviet Union, by the Central Committee’s resolution of 1932 which dissolved existing artists’ associations and replaced them by centralised organisations. Consequently, the controlling function of literary criticism and censorship as well as the repression of deviant authors and movements have been considered the most important aspects for scholarly examination. There are, however, hardly any comparative studies of concrete examples, and those which do exist are mainly concerned with art (rather than literature) since parallels between National Socialist works and the Socialist Realism of the Stalin period seem patently obvious there.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See M. Damus, Sozialistischer Realismus und Kunst im Nationalsozialismus (Frankfurt, 1981).
A Guski, Kak zakaljalas’ stal’ — biographisches Dokument oder sozialistisch-realistisches Romanepos? Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 62 (1981), no. 1, pp. 116–45.
Cf. P. Aley, Jugendliteratur im Dritten Reich (Hamburg, 1967) pp. 153–4
U. Nassen, Jugend, Buch und Konjunktur 1933–1945 (Munich. 1987) p. 47.
See, for instance, A. Littmann, Herbert Norkus und die Hitlerjungen vom Beusselkietz (Berlin, 1934)
R. Ramlow, Herbert Norkus? Hier! Opfer und Sieg der Hitlerjugend (Stuttgart, 1940).
Cf. H. Gunther, Die Verstaadichung der Literatur (Stuttgart, 1984) pp. 95–106.
The quotations refer to the edition N. Ostrovsky, Kak zakalyalas’ stal’ in: Sobr. soch. v trekh tomakh (Moscow, 1974/75) t. 1.
The quotation refers to Karl Aloys Schenzinger, Der Hitlerjunge Quex (Berlin, 1932).
H.J. Baden, Literatur und Bekehrung (Stuttgard, 1968) p. 14, distinauishes between immediate and gradual conversion.
K. Vondung, Magie und Manipulation (Göttingen, 1971) p. 189.
E. Fromm, The Fear of Freedom (London, 1960) p. 130. For the masochist component in Stalinist culture see Igor Smirnov,’ scriptum sub specie sovietica’, Russian Language Journal 61 (1987), no. 138–9, pp. 115–38.
See N. Tumarkin, Lenin lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia Cambridge, Mass./London, England, 1983)
Ch. Lane, The Rites of Rulers (Cambridge University Press, 1981) pp. 210–20.
For the structure of the traditional Bildungsroman see H. Esselborn Krumbiegel, Der Held in Roman. Formen des deutschen Entwicklungsromans im frühen 20. Jahrhundert (Darmstadt, 1983) pp. 14–25.
For the voluntarism of Stalinist culture cf. K. Clark, The Soviet Novel. History as Ritual (Chicago/London, 1981) pp. 136–52
V. Paperny, Kul’tura dva (Ann Arbor, 1985) pp. 231–41.
D. Grenz, ‘Entwicklung als Bekehrung und Wandlung. Zu einem Typus der nationalsozialistischen Jugendliteratur’, in M. Lypp (ed.), Lileratur für Kinder (Göttingen, 1977) pp.123–54, at p. 134.
A. Gruen, Der Verrat am Selbst (Munich. 1984) p. 132.
Cf. R.J. Lifton, Revolutionary Immortality. Mao Tse-Tung and the Chinese Cultural Revolution (London, 1969) pp. 45–60.
Cf. E.M. Meletinskii, Poetika mifa (Moscow, 1976) pp. 282, 313.
For this distinction see M. Eliade, The Quest. History and Meaning in Religion (Chicago/London, 1969) pp. 112–13.
See, for instance, J. Bark, ‘Bildungsromane’, in: H.A. Glaser (ed.), Vom Nachmärz zur Gründerzeit. Realismus 1848–1880 (Hamburg, 1982) pp. 144–62.
Cf. M. Swales, The German Bildungsroman from Wieland to Hesse (Princeton, N.J., 1978)
M. Beddow, The Fiction of Humanity. Studies in the Bildungsroman from Wieland to Thomas Mann (Cambridge, 1982)
K.-D. Sorg, Gebrochene Teleologie. Studien zum Bildungsroman von Goethe bis Thomas Mann (Heidelberg, 1983).
Cf. R. Geissler, Dekadenz und Heroismus. Zeitroman und völkischnationalsozialistische Literaturkritik (Stuttgart, 1964) p. 73.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 School of Slavonic and East European Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Günther, H. (1990). Education and Conversion: The Road to the New Man in the Totalitarian Bildungsroman. In: Günther, H. (eds) The Culture of the Stalin Period. Studies in Russia and East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20651-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20651-3_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-20653-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20651-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)