Skip to main content

Surface Runoff

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Rainfall, if it is not intercepted by vegetation or by artificial surfaces such as roofs or pavements, falls on the earth and either evaporates, infiltrates or lies in depression storage. When the losses arising in these ways are all provided for, there may remain a surplus that, obeying the gravitation laws, flows over the surface to the nearest stream channel. The streams coalesce into rivers and the rivers find their way down to the sea. When the rain is particularly intense or prolonged, or both, the surplus runoff becomes large and the stream and river channels cannot accept all the water suddenly arriving. They become filled and overflow and in so doing they do great harm to the activities of men. The most serious effect of flooding may be the washing away of the fertile top soil in which crops are grown, and of which there is already a scarcity on the earth. In urban areas there is great damage to property, pollution of water supplies, danger to life and often total disruption of communications. In agrarian societies floods are feared like pestilence because they can destroy crops, cattle and habitations, and bring famine in their wake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Young, L. H. Mean annual rainfall/run-off relationship. J. Inst. Wat. Eng., 24, No. 7 (1970) 423

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Natural Environment Research Council. Flood Studies Report. Vol. 1, NERC, 1975, Chapter 6

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.S. 3680 Methods of measurement of liquid flow in open channels. Part 3: 1964 Velocity area methods. Part 4: 1965 Weirs and flumes

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corbett, D. M. et al., Stream-gaging procedure. Water Supply Paper 888, Washington D.C., 1945

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan, T. J. and Somers, W. P. Discharge measurements of gaging stations. U.S. Geological Survey Tech. Water Resources Inv., Bk. 3, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carter, R. W. and Davidian, J. Discharge ratings at gauging stations. U.S. Geological Survey Surface Water Tech., Bk. 1, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Water Measurement Manual, 1953

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ackers, P. and Harrison, A. J. M. Critical depth flumes for flow measure-ment in open channels. Hydrological Research Paper No. 5, H.M.S.O., London, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parshall, R. L. Measuring water in irrigation channels with Parshall flumes and small weirs. U.S. Dept. Agr. Circular 843, 1950

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ackers, P. Flow measurement by weirs and flumes. Int. Conf. on Modern Developments in Flow Measurement, Harwell 1971, Paper No. 3

    Google Scholar 

  11. White, W. R. Flat-vee weirs in alluvial channels. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 97, HY3 (March 1971) 395–408

    Google Scholar 

  12. White, W. R. The performance of two dimensional and flat-V triangular profile weirs. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Suppl. (ii), (1971) 21–48

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burgess, J. S. and White, W. R. Triangular profile (Crump) weir: two dimensional study of discharge characteristics. Report No. INT 52, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdome, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison, A. J. M. and Owen, M. W. A new type of structure for flow measurement in steep streams, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., (1967) 273–96

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, C. D. Open channel water measurement with the broad-crested weir. Int. Commun. Irr. Drainage Bull., (1958) 46–51

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hosegood, P. H. and Bridle, M. K. A feasibility study and develop-ment programme for continuous dilution gauging. Report No. 6, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO/R 55, 1966 Liquid flow measurement in open channels; dilution methods for measurement of steady flow. Part 1, Constant rate injection

    Google Scholar 

  18. Littlewood, I. G. Research and development of a streamflow dilution gauging technique for the Llyn Brianne Acid Waters Study, Wales, Department of Geography, University College, Swansea, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aastad, J. and Søgnen, R. Discharge measurements by means of a salt solution; the relative dilution method. Proc. IASH General Assembly, Rome 1954, Vol. 3, pp. 289–292

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herschy, R. W. and Loosemore, W. R. The ultrasonic method of river flow measurement. Symp. on River Gauging by Ultrasonic and Electromagnetic Methods, University of Reading, Dec. 1974

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foster, W. E. Experience with the construction and engineering operation of ultrasonic gauging stations. Symp. on River Gauging by Ultrasonic and Electromagnetic Methods, University of Reading, Dec. 1974

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boyer, M. C. Determining discharge of gauging stations affected by variable slope. Civ. Eng., 9, (1939) 556

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell, W. D. Stage-fall-discharge relations for steady flow in prismatic channels. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1164, Washington D.C., 1954

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stevens, J. C. A method of estimating stream discharge from a limited number of gaugings. Eng. News, 18 July 1907

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koelzer, V. A. Reservoir Hydraulics. Handbook of Applied Hydraulics (ed. by C. V. Davis and K. E. Sorenson), 3rd editon, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969, Section 4

    Google Scholar 

  26. Low Flow Studies, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom, January 1980

    Google Scholar 

  27. University of Salford, Department of Civil Engineering. Small-scale hydro-electric potential of Wales, Department of Energy, London, 1980

    Google Scholar 

Further reading

  • Herschy, R. W. New methods of river gauging. Facets of Hydrology (ed. J. C. Rodda), John Wiley, New York, 1976, Chapter 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. E. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins. Bull Geol. Soc. Am., 56 (March 1954) 275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logarithmic plotting of stage-discharge observations. Tech. Note 3. Water Resources Board, Reading, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. E. and Shaw, B. L. Flood frequency as a function of catchment characteristics. Inst. Civ. Eng. Symposium on River Flood Hydrology, 1966, pp. 115–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodda, J. C. The significance of characteristics of basin rainfall and morphometry in a study of floods in the United Kingdom. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Symposium on Floods and their Computation, Leningrad. International Association of Scientific Hydrology, 85 (1967) 834

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoot, G. F. and Novak, C. E. Measurement of discharge by the moving boat method. U.S. Geological Survey Tech. Water Resources Inv., Bk. 3 (1969)All

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N. Statistical analysis of geomorphic research. J. Geol., 62, No. 1 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 E. M. Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, E.M. (1990). Surface Runoff. In: Engineering Hydrology. Red Globe Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20610-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20610-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Red Globe Press, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-53180-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20610-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics