Abstract
Thus Engels summarised the traditional Marxist thesis that the 1789 revolution had been the instrument of immutable social change in which the aristocratic, feudal and landed élite was replaced by the entrepreneurial bourgeoisie, the symbol of capitalist industrialisation. As we have already noted, some rich nobles were entrepreneurs. We have observed that many middle-class entrepreneurs demonstrated an un-Marxist preoccupation with the acquisition of landed estates. Bureaucratic and professional elements in the bourgeoisie were equally active in the property market. While the middle class were eager to huy land, European aristocracies were far more resilient than Marx had expected. In this chapter we shall consider the impact of the bourgeois quest for landed respectability. Why did the bourgeois want to become the squire and what were the consequences for social and economic development in the nineteenth century?
In the great revolution, France swept feudalism away and established the hegemony of the bourgeoisie, doing this with an exemplary completeness not achieved in any other European country.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Note and References
I. F. Engels, Preface to the third German edition of The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1926), 22.
D. Beales, The Risorgimento and the Unification of Italy (1971).
D. Spring (ed.), European Landed Elites in the Nineteenth Century (1977), 3.
A. Young, Travels in France During the Years 1787, 1788 and 1789 (1929).
S. Woolf, The History of Italy, 1700–1860 (1979), 44.
J. A. Davis, Conflict and Control: Law and Order in Nineteenth-Centuy Italy (1988), 46.
H. Clout and K. Sutton, ‘The cadastre as a source for French rural studies’, Agricultural History, 43 (1969), 215–24.
A. J. Tudesq, La Bourgeoisie de Béziers Sous la Monarchie de Juillet d’Après les Listes Electorales Censitaires (1959)
A. Daumard, Les Bourgeois de Paris au XIXe Siècle (1970).
F. O. Sargent, ‘Feudalism to family farms in France’, Agricultural History (1961), 193–201.
F. O. Sargent, ‘The persistence of communal tenure in French agriculture’, Agricultural History, 32 (1958), 100–9.
D. C. Higgs, ‘Social mobility and hereditary titles in France, 1814–30: the majorats-sur-demande’, Histoire Sociale-Social History XIV, 27 (1981), 45.
D. C. Higgs, ‘Politics and land ownership among the French nobility after the Revolution’, European Studies Review1 (1971),105–21.
T. Zeldin, ‘Peasants’ in France 1848–1945: Ambition and Love (1979), 145.
P. Ginsborg, Daniele Manin and the Venetian Revolution of 1848–9 (1979).
G. Luzzatto, ‘The Italian economy in the first decade after unification’ in F. Crouzet et al. (eds), Essays in European Economic History, 1789–1914 (1969)
F. Stern, Gold and Iron: Bismarck, Bleichröder and the Building of the German Empire (1977), 172.
A. Gerschenkron, ‘Agricultural policies and industry in Russia, 1861–1917’ in H. J. Habakkuk and M. Postan, Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vi, II (1966).
G. Stephenson, History of Russia, 1812–1945 (1969).
Copyright information
© 1990 P. Pilbeam
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pilbeam, P.M. (1990). Economic Interests of the Middle Classes: Bourgeois Landowners. In: The Middle Classes in Europe, 1789–1914. Themes in Comparative History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20606-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20606-3_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-38559-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20606-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)