Capital as a Social Relation

  • Anwar Shaikh
Part of the The New Palgrave book series (NPA)

Abstract

Taken by itself, a sharp stone is simply a relic of some ancient and inexorable geological process. But appropriated as a cutting instrument, it is a tool or, in a somewhat more murderous vein, a weapon. As a stone, it is a natural object. But as a tool or weapon, it is an eminently social object whose natural form is merely the carrier of the social relations which, so to speak, happen to have seized upon it.

Keywords

Europe Mandel Fetishism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alchian, A. A. and Allen, W.A. 1983. Exchange and Production: Competition, Coordination, and Control. 3rd edn, Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  2. Mandel, E. 1976. Introduction to Vol. I of Capital by K. Marx (1867) London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Marx, K. 1858. Grundrisse. London: Penguin, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Marx, K. 1867. Capital, Vol. I. London: Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Marx, K. 1894. Capital, Vol. III. Introduced by Ernest Mandel, New York: Vintage, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Rosdolsky, R. 1977. The Making of Marx’s Capital. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  7. Shaikh, A. 1982. Neo-Ricardian economics: a wealth of algebra, a poverty of theory. Review of Radical Political Economics 14(2), Summer, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anwar Shaikh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations