Skip to main content

Utility Theory and Decision Theory

  • Chapter
Utility and Probability

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

Abstract

The conjunction of utility theory and decision theory involves formulations of decision making in which the criteria for choice among competing alternatives are based on numerical representations of the decision agent’s preferences and values. Utility theory as such refers to those representations and to assumptions about preferences that correspond to various numerical representations. Although it is a child of decision theory, utility theory has emerged as a subject in its own right as seen, for example, in the contemporary review by Fishburn (see REPRESENTATION OF PREFERENCES). Readers interested in more detail on representations of preferences should consult that essay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Allais, M. and Hagen, O. (eds) 1979. Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. 1974. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Amsterdam: North–Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V.S. 1982. Stochastic dominance: a research bibliography. Management Science 28, 698–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, D. 1738. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientarium Imperalis Petropolitanae 5, 175–92. Trans. L. Sommer, Econometrica 22, (1954), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. 1973. The ordering of portfolios in terms of mean and variance. Review of Economic Studies 40, 167–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1973. The Theory of Social Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1974. Lexicographic orders, utilities, and decision rules: a survey. Management Science 20, 1442–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1981. Subjective expected utility: a review of normative theories. Theory and Decision 13, 139–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1982a. The Foundations of Expected Utility. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1982b. Nontransitive measurable utility. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26,31–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1986. The axioms of subjective probability. Statistical Science 1, 335–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. and Allen, R.G. D. 1934. A reconsideration of the theory of value, I, II. Economica 1, 52–75, 196–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker, H.S. 1961. The present state of consumption theory. Econometrica 29,704–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. and Richter, M.K. 1971. Revealed preference without demand continuity assumptions. In Preferences, Utilit, and Demand, ed. J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter and H.F. Sonnenschein, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libby, R. and Fishburn, P.C. 1977. Behavioural models of risk taking in business decisions: a survey and evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research 15, 272–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. 1982. Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal 92, 805–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.J. 1982. ‘Expected utility’ analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50, 277–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. 1959. Portfolio Selection. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas–Coiell, A. 1974. An equilibrium existence theorem without complete or transitive preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. 1951. Non–cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54, 286–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W. 1964. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32, 122–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. 1961. Applied Statistical Decision Theory. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. 1931. Truth and probability. In The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, ed. R.B. Braithwaite, New York: Harcourt, Brace,

    Google Scholar 

  • Reprinted in Studies in Subjective Probability, ed. H.E. Kyburg and H.E. Smokier, New York: Wiley, 1964,61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley. 2nd rev. edn, Dover Publications, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. 1984. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Reprint no. 84, Institute for Mathematics and its Application, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1977. Social choice theory: a re–examination. Econometrica 45, 53–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. and Sonnenschein, H. 1975. Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2, 345–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S. 1983. Preference reversals: a broader perspective. American Economic Review 73, 596–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein, H.F. 1971. Demand theory without transitive preferences with applications to the theory of competitive equilibrium. In Preferences, Utility and Demand, ed. J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter and H.F. Sonnenschein. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 215–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. 1950. The development of utility theory: I, II. Journal of Political Economy 58, 307–27, 373–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. 1965. The theory of portfolio selection. In The Theory of Interest Rates, ed. F.H. Hahn and F.P.R. Brechling, New York: Macmillan, 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. 1960. Preference and rational choice in the theory of consumption. In Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959, ed. K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin and P. Suppes, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 129–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2nd edn, 1947; 3rd edn, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, G.A. and Findlay, M.C. (eds) 1978. Stochastic Dominance. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R.L. 1972. An Introduction to Bayesian Inference and Decision. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fishburn, P.C. (1990). Utility Theory and Decision Theory. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Utility and Probability. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics